• cley_faye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    134
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’m sure the evil intolerant mechanic guy wanted to remove them for some fake, made-up reasons like “you’re gonna die if you ride with these”.

    • RegalPotoo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m guessing the answer is “no, cos freedom” or something, but do you not have to get a road worthiness certification updated periodically in America?

      • Jyek@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Most places annually through either smog or state inspection. Some states don’t have any kind of state inspection though.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Ah, you’ve been to the Hoosier state then. On behalf of those of us who live there, we apologize.

          • Spot@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            10 months ago

            Owning a beater was soo much easier though! And, as I started driving there I’m thankful, 'cause I had a beater. I remember it was a huge deal when we moved to Ohio because we would have to actually have the state inspect our families cars for the first time since purchase.

            • RegalPotoo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              10 months ago

              Yeah, I find this super weird. Where I live, any vehicle more than 3 years old needs to be inspected annually, and anything older than 10 years needs to be inspected every 6 months - it’s a super basic safety check; are your tires legal, do your brakes work, is your suspension system in spec etc. Pretty much just making sure that vehicle is safe to drive - you get a bit of leeway if the certificate has expired, but if it’s more than a few weeks past you risk getting fined or having your car impounded

                • TwanHE@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Because budget or not they use the same roads. And it’s usually not only the person driving being in danger when something breaks.

              • wrekone@lemmyf.uk
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                In Oregon they check your carbon emissions every 2 years. That’s it. They don’t give a shit how fucked up your car is as long as the emissions are low.

        • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          More like why do they require me to furnish them with a Certificate of Insurance in their name every time I go in for an oil change

  • girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    100
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Everyone should have to pass a basic automotive knowledge course before getting their driver’s license.

      • Dabundis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        57
        ·
        10 months ago

        At least where I live, the licensing test covers rules of the road, not automotive knowledge. I think this commenter was referring to some test covering very surface-level knowledge of vehicles, with a focus on ways to tell if a car is unasafe to drive.

        • Dojan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’m in Sweden, we get two big books of just theory stuff. There are entire sections on how deep the patterns must be, when you are allowed to use what type of tyres (summer, friction, studded), etc. along with what consequences there are.

          You must have winter tyres between the 1st of December and the 31st of March, so long as there may be snow or ice on the roads. Studded tires are only allowed between the 1st of October through to the 15th of April as they wear down the roads and cause excessive pollution.

          There is so much general car knowledge. Warning lights, optimal tyre pressure (which is variable depending on your car and the load), how to drive in an eco-friendly manner, child seats, it never fucking ends.

          https://i.imgur.com/x28YBDr.jpg https://i.imgur.com/d2h59gI.jpg https://i.imgur.com/sZltwyW.jpg

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      10 months ago

      Everyone should have a universal basic income!

      In the long run, some renters wind up paying twice as much for their tires as they would have paid if they’d bought them outright.

      Would only do that if you’re desperate. I’d bet 10:1, the tires in OP result from poverty.

      PS: you’re not wrong!

      • RegalPotoo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Or, alternatively, we should build cities where owning a car isn’t a requirement to hold down a job, and keep piloting a two ton death machine as a privilege, not a right

      • TheIllustrativeMan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        Jesus, at $20/mo you would pay for a full set of the (expensive) OEM tires on my car in less than a year. They’re warrantied for 3 years of standard mileage, so even worse than double.

    • Algaroth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I got my license in Sweden and there are laws for when you must have summer tires and winter tires as well as how deep the pattern needs to be. This is all covered in the writing portion of the test. It’s quite possible that someone driving with wheels like that might get their license suspended at the least.

      • 1984@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yes it’s illegal to drive on tires with worn out patterns. I thought it was the same everywhere in the civilized world.

        • experbia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          it is. you’re correct.

          us Americans, we seem to like to swerve deftly around many such useful civil universalities.

          things you’d assume are vital to a peaceful, comfortable, safe people are often things that seem to baffle us.

          i think this repeated swerving should disabuse anyone of any notion of the USA being a civilized nation, but somehow people keep classifying us as better than we are. lived here my whole life… not sure how someone could make that mistake, honestly. not unless they were really rich, I guess.

          • 1984@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            One big part is because of Hollywood. The entire world image of America comes from movies.

            Once you start to look into the prison system, the justice system, the financial system… Well, nothing actually builds on any feeling of caring about its citizens at all.

    • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      10 months ago

      For the driver licence in France there is questions like that:

      • how to recognize a worn tire
      • where to find the right tire pressure
      • check the oil level of the engine
      • check the brake liquid level …
    • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      This, plus mandatory retesting every 5 years. New traffic signal’s & infrastructure, aging drivers, changing eyesight, refresher learning, etc

  • shininghero@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    These are the same people who drive with paper-thin, or even fully rusted off, brake rotors. And then they yell at the mechanics for “upselling them” on brake maintenance.

    I firmly believe that brakes should be the absolute last thing to fail on a car. The tires can rupture, the steering shatter, and the car snapped in two, but I must be able to bring the remaining wreckage to a stop.

    • Vespair@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      65
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Sure, whatever you say guy who definitely isn’t a shady up-selling mechanic

      How can something called a brake, break?

      That obviously just makes it more brake

      • PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        10 months ago

        I am both laughing my cock off and wanting to smash the downvote button in sheer rage because I can just see this being an actual conversation.

    • ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      10 months ago

      Meh, the whole thing needs maintenance.

      Brakes won’t do shit when all the tires are flat and you just lock up the wheels. Or when your tie rod end snaps and the car veers off the freeway faster than anyone can react to press the brakes.

    • max@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 months ago

      And this is why I am so grateful for the yearly inspections for cars in my country. You still have idiots driving, but at least their vehicles will be somewhat safe.