Last words on the cross:

“Well…so much for nepotism!”

  • OctopusKurwa @lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    “I don’t think there is a Q”

    Maybe this is Mark Goodacre’s account instead of Ehrman.

    It seems to me more likely that there’s more of the historical Jesus in Thomas than there is in John and I wouldn’t be surprised at all if it was written earlier.

    Thanks for the read. I’m someone who only recently started reading about early Christianity recently and it absolutely blows my mind how diverse the theology was so early.

    • kromem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Maybe this is Mark Goodacre’s account instead of Ehrman.

      Goodacre subscribes to Matthean priority over Luke, and also thinks Thomas is late (though if he were to apply his own methodology of editorial fatigue to Matthew 13:43 vs Thomas 57 it would indicate at least the core of Thomas predates Matthew).

      And yes, it’s really a shame Lemmy doesn’t have an equivalent of /r/AcademicBiblical. I spent a lot of time there and it was a very fun community.

      • kautau@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Having read through all of this I would emplore you to start that community, it was enthralling to read, and I appreciate you putting so much effort into your comments