• corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    24 minutes ago

    I remember interviewing at Google years ago (if you’re keeping score, it was 2012/2013 just before their stock hiccupped and my onboarding was killed as I was only a 97% fit), and the guy was religious about page load times. “We cut 200 lines of code if it’ll give us a millisecond of page load speed”, that kind of thing.

    How they’ve fallen.

  • communism@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I didn’t know they allowed you to search without JS before. If you’re at the point of disabling JS, presumably for security or privacy reasons, why not just use DDG which works perfectly well without JS?

  • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Just makes me realize that I haven’t used Google search in like over a year now because I use Kagi. Even before that i was using searx-ng.

  • Liam Mayfair@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Feels good not to care anymore about the unrelenting enshittification of Reddit, Twitter and Google since I switched away from them.

    • yokonzo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Can’t wait until they enshittify, the way I see it, everything will eventually, even Lemmy. It’s up to us to not settle too hard in one place

      • Brewchin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        50 minutes ago

        The core of what you’re saying has been my approach for many years. Never go “all in” on anything.

        Convenience is one thing (to me, but it’s everything to so many), but it’s just one factor. And if it means I am (or my data is) the product, it costs too much.

      • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        The fact Lemmy is open source and federated makes it almost impossible to enshittify. What are you gonna do, show ads? Third party clients are first class citizens here

      • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        No, I don’t think that’s sustainable, nor is it sustainable to act as if it were true. Given the lack of resources we have compared to Google the only way to make it work is to stick with something for the long run, and bake in protections in both the technology and the organisational structure. Being opensource and federated goes a long way there, there’s no real reason why something not for profit would have to enshittify. But people won’t put in the effort to keep building it if they think that’s inevitable.

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Can confirm. I didn’t think it’d be like that but it do be like that. DDG gang, where you at.

    • TheFunkyMonk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I switched to DDG recently due to the manifest v3 changes and AI junk and have been really liking it. It feels like what Google used to be when it was good.

  • Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Cool. As if the over-promotion of AI garbage wasn’t enough of a reason to stop using it.

  • palordrolap@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 hours ago

    If the British civil service, even operating under previous administrations, can put together a multi-functioning government domain that runs reasonably well without JavaScript, there’s no reason Google can’t continue to do the same with a ducking web search.

    The former works better with JavaScript, that’s true, but it works OK without and that’s the point.

    Then again, the civil service were ordered to do it largely out of spite because the government didn’t want to give the plebs any excuse for not being able to use the site.

    I’m not sure how to get Google to lose the need for scripting in the same way.

    • Vent@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I think this isn’t a case of if Google can, but rather of why they should. Do enough people really use the modern web without JavaScript to justify spending the resources to test and maintain functionality without JS? And they probably don’t want to let the few people that don’t have JS to open support tickets or write articles about how google.com is broken. Easier to just block it on purpose than to let it decay.

      It makes more sense that a government website would support it, since they can’t let even a single person fall through the cracks, and changing laws/regulations is more difficult than making a company decision.

  • Soulifix@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    If I have to go back to using Excite, I will.

    Like, I’m tired of Google Search, it’s always been shit. I’m tired of it’s AI Generalization, tired of it’s garbage results, tired of the stupid section of questions asked by ‘people’ with these low-hanging fruit and softball but dumb questions there is to be asked.

    • tkr@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      yt-dlp direct to > peertube. Never google/yt again, i would prefer books instead cooperate with them

    • cygnus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Somehow I doubt the bloated AI search engine works without JS.