Building massive production capacity to replace all the cars just locks us in to having cars though

:(

People who previously were at the high end of GPU can now afford used H100s -> they sell their GPUs -> we can maybe afford them

99% of people will buy the cheaper TV with tracking, it probably not sustainable to sell the expensive one without. This stuff just needs to be banned

The chance that it’s compromised is small but unfortunately the chance that it would be noticed is pretty small too, nobody is reading all the source code of all the apps on fdroid

Wow, I thought the anonymousejoker was deranged but you are at least as crazy if not worse. I guess it makes sense that a niche privacy community would attract such weirdos but you’re (both) making it really hard for people to get quality information.

There is no issue from graphenes side really, Google wallet doesn’t work because obviously Google doesn’t allow it to. nfc payments always worked if you are lucky enough to be with a bank that does it through the bank app itself, there’s nothing intrinsic about the os that stops them. There are a few of those online banks/money apps offering this now, some people have said PayPal works? And various other services. If you Google a bit you should find some suggestions. I don’t think the convenience is worth the privacy invasion of mobile payments, it defeats the whole point of having a secure os tbh.

You’re inclined to disbelieve her because it’s what you want to be true.

Etc etc.

Now that’s a paranoid take lmao

Yes, if you have a domain you can catch all emails being sent there even if you don’t know the name - having the domain means controlling the bit after the @, so every email address with that ending.

They couldn’t give less of a shit about the 7 people in the world that use pi-holes

Hahahaha, good one

New as in 1800s, pretty sure some of these other places didn’t exist then too.

Yes, it’s pure unfiltered bullshit. A time honoured way to get investment tbh

No that’s correct

the token is only used for governance (and possibly also fundraising)

That should make you just as worried

Maybe make the royalty per user rather than per article. Then there’s no incentive to ban news.

no one says no profits should be had at all.

Actually quite a few of us do say that

So you never stumbled upon bugs while doing work

That’s not what I said… Either the bug is related to the task, or it isn’t. If it’s not related to the task, there’s no reason to fix it on the same local branch either.

Also, some teams do care about building their work on atomic commits, because they understand the problems caused by mixing up unrelated work on the same PR, specially when auditing changes to track where a regression was introduced. You might feel it’s ok to post a PR that does multiple things like bumping up a package version, linting unrelated code, fixing an issue, and post comments on an unrelated package, but others know those are four separate PRs and should be pushed as four separate PRs.

Well, these things don’t meet the standards of your earlier example at all. Linting unrelated code and posting comments on an unrelated package clearly aren’t needed for someone to work on the main issue fix they’re doing. If it’s unrelated code you again lose nothing by switching branches to do the work.

Oh, okay. I’ve never encountered a situation where I needed that bug fixed for the task but it shouldn’t be fixed as part of the task; if they’re touching the same functionality like that I really don’t see the need for two PRs. But sure, sounds helpful in that really niche case.