• EnderMB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The man can’t release an affordable electric car, despite it being on his roadmap for over a decade. Cunt isn’t releasing an affordable taxi lol

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Honestly, taxis don’t need to be cheap, they need to be reliable. I’m sure a taxi company would be happy to spend $100k if it meant minimal maintenance and far less staff, since it would pay for itself pretty quickly.

      The bigger question is, does it work? I’m guessing the answer to that is… no.

      • hakunawazo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        That’s the reason why Elon wants to fly to Mars, to get a working Johnny cab instead of his crap cab. Now it makes all sense.

  • snooggums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    8 hours ago

    For true believers who hear Musk talk but have paid little or no attention to Tesla’s actual progress with autonomous driving technology, new car development, production ramping, or robotics, the event will have seemed like something of a success.

    Fucking lol

  • paw@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    8 hours ago

    As far as I understood, the robot taxis may start production by 2026 or 2027. Shouldn’t we live all on Mars by then, according to Musk?

    /s

    • Ace@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 hours ago

      robotaxis will be viable about the time they are powered by on-board micro-fusion reactors. Which will be great bc you’ll never need to plug them in or refuel.

    • DrCake@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Who would win. A cyberpunk looking “$30k” robotaxi or one speed bump/pot hole

      • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        8 hours ago

        In the future, there are no potholes or imperfections of any kind. The ground and buildings are smooth, shiny, and constantly maintained to perfection somehow. Everything looks like a starship.

        • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Camera pans down to the lower levels. Dark illuminated streets are visible, illuminated by sparse sunlight that manages to find cracks in the starship like road above. Flickering mismatched neon signs offer work, with long lines of broken humans waiting to find any job not taken over by AI and Optimus robots.

          • helenslunch@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I don’t want to yuck your yum but I think it looks badass. I think the concept is badass. I don’t want to own a car but I also can’t afford a chauffeur. We don’t have much of any public transit in my area. Bike paths are making progress but still not what I would consider safe. An autonomous van that carries 20 passengers would be very cost-effective. It’s not an ideal solution but may be the best one we could actually implement using existing infrastructure and without voter approval.

            Also that bottom part appears to be a similar height to any typical car to me, and is supposedly just an aerodynamic skirt that will fold up if it actually hits anything. That’s what I’ve read but obviously can’t verify.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              I think the concept is cool, and it would probably make a good replacement for buses. In my area, we have on-demand vans run by the org that runs the buses, and they basically take people to/from any transit stop in the area. A robovan would replace those, and potentially replace buses as well, and they could run more frequently because you don’t need to have drivers.

              So I absolutely like the idea, but I still think it looks dumb. Why screens instead of windows? Why does it look like it’s from a video game?

              • helenslunch@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 hours ago

                Why screens instead of windows?

                I mean theoretically you could use Miracast or similar technology to cast whatever you want onto those displays, whether that’s watching movies/TV or doing work from your computer.

                It has windows.

                Why does it look like it’s from a video game?

                I mean why do vehicles from video games looks like they do? Because they’re cool. You can say a lot of things about Tesla but you can’t call them conventional. Sometimes that’s good, and sometimes not so much. Beauty is subjective.

                • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 hours ago

                  It has windows.

                  On the sides, and they’re like 1/3 of the total length of the vehicle, and on the ceiling. At least from the bit that I saw in the presentation. Buses today have much better visibility.

                  Because they’re cool

                  Nah, I think it’s because it fits the art direction of the game. Cyberpunk has a certain feel, and GTA has another.

                  The robovan and the cybertruck don’t match anything in the real world, or anything that came before. So it sticks out like an eyesore IMO.

                  But yeah, beauty is subjective, and I guess we’ll see what it actually looks like if it ever hits the market.

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        No statements on production for the robovan. Cost he said would be $0.05-0.10/mile, though unclear if that was to the owner or to the customer. Double that for the customer and it’s still very cost effective.

      • _bcron_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        That image is of the bus so it probably requires a ‘fleet’ type purchase alongside a maintenance contract

        • Kwozyman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Unfortunately a lot of people do. So many people care they made him the richest person in the world. I always hated obscenely rich people, but there’s something special with Musk, he manages to add insult to injury.