![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/d82718c7-5579-4676-8e2e-97b4188f10d3.png)
I really getting with “oh, you believe gasoline can power cars?!?” next time I meed a true believer.
I really getting with “oh, you believe gasoline can power cars?!?” next time I meed a true believer.
In most of the world, no, it would be the balloon police. Even if normal cops could handle it.
Also, the balloon police has much more impressive weapons.
It has been in exponential growth since the signal was distinguishable from the noise, and exponentials do not have inflection points…
The only inflection we can expect is when it reaches 1/4 of saturation.
Nothing in my post (or in robots.txt) has any relation to distributing your content.
TBF, pushing a site to the public while adding a “no scrapping” rule is a bit of a shitty practice; and pushing it and adding a “no scrapping, unless you are Google” is a giant shitty practice.
Rules for politely scrapping the site are fine. But then, there will be always people that disobey those, so you must also actively enforce those rules too. So I’m not sure robots.txt is really useful at all.
upper 0.5% of wealth
I don’t think nobody out of the upper 0.1% of the US would gain by their policies (and those mostly vote against them), and 90% of the people in it would probably lose too. For the 0.01%, it’s a matter of valuing short or long term gains and actual wealth as opposed to “Hah! Suffer you poor! I’m better than that!”
Tony Lazuto says you should delete System32
Yep, different licenses have different consequences.
The same way, if the BSD internet stack was GPL, we wouldn’t have an internet at all.
It doesn’t glow. The glowing is all in your eyes.
There was a ridiculous, completely unbalanced version they published just after Alpha Centauri where the most powerful unit was a van-looking ecoterrorism thing that transformed everything around it into forest.
They could make a sequel to that one instead.
That’s yet another great joke that GNU ruined.
That’s a very good point.
It applies to more things than software projects. Like new companies keep innovating until they succeed. Political organizations keep pressing for change until they get some small gain. People are eager to throw themselves at work until they get something they care about…
Hum… That implies that at least 30% of some subclass of projects are successful.
Oh, they absolutely should. A “Jarvis” would be great.
But that thing they are pushing has absolutely no relation to a “Jarvis”.
Looks like something that should work just fine.
Maybe cut that steak more.
Well, ok. I don’t really plan to do that. It was a joke.
I do wish it was something viable, though.
That’s why I plan to move my servers into an L4 clone.
It’s close to 1 in 20 PCs nowadays. It’s growing very quickly, and has been adopted in non-irrelevant amounts for a few years already.
We can thank them for providing quality assurance.