By Jeremy Hsu on September 24, 2024


Popular smart TV models made by Samsung and LG can take multiple snapshots of what you are watching every second – even when they are being used as external displays for your laptop or video game console.

Smart TV manufacturers use these frequent screenshots, as well as audio recordings, in their automatic content recognition systems, which track viewing habits in order to target people with specific advertising. But researchers showed this tracking by some of the world’s most popular smart TV brands – Samsung TVs can take screenshots every 500 milliseconds and LG TVs every 10 milliseconds – can occur when people least expect it.

“When a user connects their laptop via HDMI just to browse stuff on their laptop on a bigger screen by using the TV as a ‘dumb’ display, they are unsuspecting of their activity being screenshotted,” says Yash Vekaria at the University of California, Davis. Samsung and LG did not respond to a request for comment.

Vekaria and his colleagues connected smart TVs from Samsung and LG to their own computer server. Their server, which was equipped with software for analysing network traffic, acted as a middleman to see what visual snapshots or audio data the TVs were uploading.

They found the smart TVs did not appear to upload any screenshots or audio data when streaming from Netflix or other third-party apps, mirroring YouTube content streamed on a separate phone or laptop or when sitting idle. But the smart TVs did upload snapshots when showing broadcasts from the TV antenna or content from an HDMI-connected device.

The researchers also discovered country-specific differences when users streamed the free ad-supported TV channel provided by Samsung or LG platforms. Such user activities were uploaded when the TV was operating in the US but not in the UK.

By recording user activity even when it’s coming from connected laptops, smart TVs might capture sensitive data, says Vekaria. For example, it might record if people are browsing for baby products or other personal items.

Customers can opt out of such tracking for Samsung and LG TVs. But the process requires customers to either enable or disable between six and 11 different options in the TV settings.

“This is the sort of privacy-intrusive technology that should require people to opt into sharing their data with clear language explaining exactly what they’re agreeing to, not baked into initial setup agreements that people tend to speed through,” says Thorin Klosowski at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a digital privacy non-profit based in California.

https://www.newscientist.com/article/2449198-smart-tvs-take-snapshots-of-what-you-watch-multiple-times-per-second/ (paywall!!)

  • Badland9085@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    ·
    6 days ago

    Imagine the amount of bandwidth and energy saved, if they didn’t do any of this bullshit.

    They are essentially using someone else’s money to get themselves more money. Fuck these people!

  • InternetPerson@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    159
    ·
    7 days ago

    For example, it might record if people are browsing for baby products or other personal items.

    Don’t mind baby products and dildos or whatever.

    They could see bank activity and even login credentials when someone is temporarily displaying their own passwords.

    This basically ignores all security measures regarding everything. Sensitive communication, company secrets and so on.

    That’s fucking seriously huge. What the fuck?!

  • Slovene@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    THIS is piracy. Along with all the other personal data selling.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    ·
    7 days ago

    Actual paper here.

    https://arxiv.org/html/2409.06203v1

    It is not sending full screenshots as anybody technical would already have guessed. It’s a few KB over an hour, so it’s content recognition hashes.

    Opt out anyway. Their study shows the opt out option does indeed opt you out of it.

  • Branny@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    6 days ago

    Not if you never connect your smart TV to the internet to complete the setup and instead use it as a dumb display (I hope)

  • Zementid@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    6 days ago

    Theoretically I could display highly illegal stuff and they would distribute it making them complicit?

    Can the API be hacked to flood their servers with petabytes of cat pictures?

    What is happening with the data? Where are the data savers?

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    You hear that? It’s a whisper… It’s a multinational multibillion dollar class action lawsuit coming after Samsung and LG. WTF!

  • Ibaudia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    Do not connect your Smart TVs to network people, seriously. Just a bad idea. Use a media center PC or some other device that allows you to stream content, and make sure the TV itself is just a big monitor, nothing more.

  • SuperFola@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    So they are allowed to pirate content actually? Even if it’s not Netflix or YouTube they take screenshots of potentially copyrighted content

  • dan@upvote.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Don’t let your TV connect to the internet. I have mine on my wifi so I can control them using Home Assistant, but they’re on an isolated VLAN with no internet access.

    Edit: Of course, this only works if you use an external box for streaming, like an Nvidia Shield, Apple TV, Google Chromecast TV or whatever they call it now, etc.

    • Staubsaugernasenmann@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      7 days ago

      But can you really be sure that it doesn’t connect to another network? i have to check again but if i recall correctly there are TVs that try to connect to other open networks or even look for other TVs from the same manufacturer and connect through those to the internet. I have to double check this again, so take this with a grain of salt

      • filcuk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        If that’s true - lan for your own content with network isolation and ripping out the WiFi antenna, I guess?? I hate this

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 days ago

      There is such a thing called HDMI Ethernet. If you connect some sort of Android box to your TV it might establish an Ethernet connection with it and thus connect to the internet.

      • eleitl@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        If you use an Android TV system you don’t get to complain about your video output device tracking.

    • LittleBorat3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I am a bit puzzled about the “even when your laptop is connected” part.

      I have a small android box connected to it and am not using apps on the TV so it should have no chance of sending screenshot out even if it takes them.

      The TV itself is not connected

      • spiffpitt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 days ago

        what kind of Android box do you have? anything you recommend? (looking to have some sort of streaming client)

        • smiletolerantly@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          Nvidia Shield. The bigger one.

          Yes, it’s a couple of years old at this point, but it’s still the best device of its kind.

          Not to mention the remote is FANTASTIC.

        • ben_dover@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          the google tv with chromecast dongle is quite decent, good price/performance ratio

        • LittleBorat3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          It’s a Chinese one that I used at first for retro gaming with emuelec. Now it is dual boot and I have kodi and newpipe on it too.

      • xavier666@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        Sorry for being paranoid but can the TV piggyback the connection used by the the streaming device/android box to send data back to the TV OEM?

        • LittleBorat3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          The only connection the TV has is hdmi. I do not think that back and forth communication is possible there.

          If the TV has wifi, it can do its thing but that would also be easy to disable.

          • xavier666@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            I think for the TVs internal wifi, it’s better to create a honeypot Wi-Fi exclusively for it, or a VLAN. It will constantly try to send data and fail. If we don’t let it connect to anything, the TV might start sniffing for other open networks.

        • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Not yet but it is clear in the future most devices will be able to do that, we will have ubiquitous low grade internet access everywhere. Your neighbours devices will let your electronics snitch on you even if you seal up your own internet

          • xavier666@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Good point. We can have a honeypot wifi. Check my other comment in the thread.

            • BalooWasWahoo@links.hackliberty.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              Okay, so for the new folks with networking, how do you set up a honeypot wifi? Have a (second) router powered on with no connection? Or is it something you can set up with one router?

              • xavier666@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 days ago

                Many routers have a functionality to create a guest wifi. These usually run on a separate VLAN so that it can’t access other devices on the network. After creating this guest wifi, you have manually disable internet access on this but keep the wifi on.

                Unfortunately the process varies between router to router.

      • bufalo1973@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        But if you connect your phone to the android box then the TV could use the phone to send the screenshots.

        TV->android box->phone->internet.