redfellow

Having enjoyed that truly good but weird movie, this story suddenly makes more sense

So with inflation, around the same actual budget, but stricter time constraints

Attacking Åland would be invading Finland, a NATO country. They wouldn’t dare.

No. another type of ML algorithm could, but not an LLM. They do not work like that.

The truth is, this is the perfect type of a comment that makes an LLM hallucinate. Sounds right, very confident, but completely full of bullshit. You can’t just throw money on every problem and get it solved fast. This is an inheret flaw that can only be solved by something else than a LLM and prompt voodoo.

They will always spout nonsense. No way around it, for now. A probabilistic neural network has zero, will always have zero, and cannot have anything but zero concept of fact - only stastisically probable result for a given prompt.

It’s a politician.

.

Spotify isn’t the only service currently.

Like I said in my op: it’s good service for the consumer. It might not be if enshittification ensues.

But compared to video streaming, it’s awesome.

The issue isn’t the service model, but the capitalistic shit behind it, that attempts to maximize profits instead of paying artists fairly.

I was referring to the sharding that happened with video streaming services. It used to be Netflix had mostly everything, in the start, similar to Spotify. Now there are services per publisher that contain their own catalogues.

Fuck. That.

I’m not familiar with the free tier, but if you don’t pay anything, I think ads are fine.

Paying and seeing ads is wrong on the other hand.

You’d be correct

Not sure what the relevance of this comment was, considering what I said

Not sure about the ads? If you mean when the app notifies you about live gigs etc. then yeah, that’s shittification. Luckily it doesn’t happen on my desk or car, but I wish it didn’t sometimes appear on my phone. That’s the one thing that might push me to add music to my video streaming arr stack.

None of these have good app support compared to Spotify, sadly. Not supported by my car, nor my Linux desktop, or home speakers.

Oh and Deezer pays even less to artists than Spotify.

I mean, Spotify is a great service for the consumer. One reasonable monthly fee for most of the music in the world.

If a similar video streaming service existed for 40€/month, I’d pay for it in a heartbeat. Now I have a plethora of arr apps and a vpn, and Plex. But it’s a hassle sometimes.

We’re all aware of the issues it created for the artists, and I’d be willing to double the fee if that money directly went to the artists, but this is where the capitalist model fails, as that won’t maximize the profits for shareholders.

If we ever come up with a way to fix the underlying greed models that come with publicly traded companies, that would be great.

As it stands, it is what it is, but I’m glad we have this, instead of a “different Spotify per music publisher”.

The PS5, and yeah still unreleased, but already driving prototypes out in the wild. They are using the companys tech mentioned in the article and hopefully we’ll see widespread adoption after testing.

I’m usually sceptic, but for once these new battery inventions are actually already implemented, and not just on paper or in a lab.

Polestar has already equipped vehicles with this tech.

I think there’s a difference between distributed and decentralised. But apart from that 👍

I’m in the same boat. I’m a paid Bitwarden user but I’d like to keep 2fa and passwords separated.

If no alternative soon, i’ll just bite the bullet and put everything in bitwarden (except itself, ofc)

You don’t have to believe it - everyone still knows you are. Time to wake up to reality. Everyone has access, the method of access isn’t discriminating, nor do you have any say in it. In other words, it’s public, free for all, and the way they set it up.

If you don’t like the free service, don’t use it. It not being how you like it isn’t wrong in any way, that’s your problem.

You can’t claim shit about equality for all and access without materials, when discussing byod. Make up your mind.

Everyone has access, byod is covered for 99% as extra convenience.

You aren’t being treated poorly, instead, you have unreasonable expectations. You need to adjust those. You are not a victim, nor were you rights violated.

You tried to circumvent security when the computer room was closed.

The librarians education most likely doesn’t cover anything more than turning things off and on, he/she isn’t likely to understand what you were doing, and the equipment isn’t maintained by the librarians - it’s simply located there.

Data persists both in the cloud, or on a memory stick. Free options exist.