• regbin_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s only stealing if you make it generate the copyrighted art and claim it as yours. Otherwise, it’s not any different than artists being inspired by existing art.

      • orrk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        literally, no finding or law supports the claim you have made, but there are several cases that have been ruled contrary to your statement. now sure, these didn’t pertain directly to AI, but they did pertain to the argument of an artist “being inspired by existing art”

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Tell me u know nothing about AI without telling me you know nothing about AI…lol

      • orrk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, thanks for pointing out that you know nothing about “AI”, and by “AI” I assume you mean the iterative learning models.