• No server operator needs to federate with you.
  • No server operator needs to tolerate things they don’t want on their instance.
  • No user of an instance needs to personally curate their own extensive never ending blocklist of users and channels they don’t want to see.

Quit your pseudo-intellectual whining and choose what instance(s) work for you. If you think regularly interacting with shit content somehow helps you stay out of an echo chamber then go ahead and make a second account on those garbage instances full of hateful people. Then you can read both the decent servers and the trash ones and be the fedora wearing ackshually right fair and balanced uber nerd you always wanted to be.

Edit: The huge number of upvotes on this post compared to the low numbers on the whiney imposers’ posts is proof of exactly where this community places its priorities.

  • meldroc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    According to some of the posts in here, apparently, wanting to ban Nazis from your instance and refusing to rebroadcast their toxic shit is being “entitled”…

  • Someology@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I knew nothing about inter-Lemmy-instance-politics when I made my account. I simply made it on a server that was actually not SO overwhelmed that it couldn’t make new accounts. I would imagine the same is true of many new users of late.

    My Lemmy exerience: We’re (heavily) advertised to on Reddit during the pre-blackout mess that we should try Lemmy. I go to try Lemmy. Server is broken. Server is broken. Server is not allowing new users. Server is not allowing new users. Ah! This one actually functions, so I can try Lemmy! Start following and posting, and finding nice communities. Then start finding out that some of these only federate in one direction, so I’m posting to people on another instance who can’t see it, because of Lemmy admin bickering and politics. Great, now I need to start over with a new account again, just when I was feeling settled in? Leaves a bad taste, and I was lucky enough to not end up on one of the MOST hated instances.

    I hate politics. You can’t escape them anywhere involving humans.

    • moozogew@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This isn’t a corporation advertising to get your business it’s a collective movement of people working to create a better internet, I totally understand you not liking politics but the reality of this world is that politics is important - the people runnning instances are generally doing it with their own time and money simply because they believe in the importance of the project, of course these are going to be people with strong principles.

      Personally I think having a complex ecosystem is going to be a great thing when it’s had time to emerge and settle but yeah for now it’s all a bit new and up in the air but that’s part of the fun

      • Someology@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        But we need guidance for users to choose an instance before they create an account. Right now, people come in blind, into a minefield of politics. It is very frustrating to walk into that mess and then get reprimanded if you mention it. There is no warning for new users.

        • theangryseal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, Christ. It didn’t even occur to me that this was a thing.

          Good luck to all of you noobs. Wish me luck.

          I’m still confused at this point.

  • HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Reminder that defederation is an explicit feature implemented into fediverse platforms. It is meant to be used as the instance sees fit. The notion that you can never defederate with anyone defeats the purpose of the fediverse, we might as well make one huge centralized platform in that case.

    No other instance owes you a federation to your instance. The fediverse’s whole philosophy is that instances get to configure both who they federate with and who federates with them.

    Finally, there is a certain irony in the people screaming “freedom” and “free speech” telling admins of private instances what they can and can’t do with their own platform.

    • Amju Wolf@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree in principle but if it ends up with defederation-by-default, or something similarly restrictive, you’ll kill the whole point of the federation and we can just go back to Reddit. IMO it should be used very sparingly (mostly to combat full on spam kinda like with email) and largely let the users themselves decide.

      OP rants about seeing garbage from garbage instances but if you actually subscribe to the communities you want, you’ll only see comments from those “garbage instances”, and there can still be decent people with interesting viewpoints on there.

  • Sentinian@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    People want to have everything in one place and they bitch and whine when everything in one place ends up getting under control of people who are shitty.

    Defederating is a needed part to maintain no party keeps too much control and ruins it for everyone. Remember why most of us left reddit for here? The ability for communities to defederate others will hopefully prevent the shit that happened.

    • Kerfuffle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Too far in either direction is bad. If everything completely separate was so great, then there would be no need for federation at all: but actually building a community and creating areas that feel alive is tough to do that way. People don’t want to individually manage connecting to random separate servers for each community, and if you didn’t connect to the right random server maybe you never even find the community you would have contributed to in positive ways.

      Getting rid of hateful stuff is good, in my opinion even though some people will muddy the waters it’s really not that hard to determine what constitutes “hateful stuff”. But there’s also going overboard. “OMG, this server allows open user signups and some random dude signed up and created an unpleasant community. DEFEDERATE THE WHOLE SERVER IMMEDIATELY! IMMEDIATELY!!!

      Maybe a better solution is to have servers publish lists of new communities but not federate them to other servers right away. Maybe they need to reach a certain age and (possibly) be subject to some sort of approval process. That will give the administrator of the server a chance to recognize and deal with the problems before it starts to spread out across the federation. Of course, if someone just lets horrible stuff fester on their server and is unresponsive then by all means it should be defederated.

      • dnick@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Right, but there is no central authority to decide the best rules, so we get to live through the process figuring itself out. Go ahead and promote what you consider a good solution, but anyone bitching that this or that platform is inhibiting their free speech by not conforming to the process they propose is just part of the noise, not someone to be taken seriously in the discussion.

    • crowlemo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Actually defederated as it works here means one party has way more power than in centralized Reddit.

      https://sh.itjust.works/comment/511746

      It ruins it for anyone who is not deeply in agreement with the admins.

      It’s admins and groupthink over users. And zero stability or discoverability. Friction with little to gain unless you’re in authoritarian lockstep

  • ѕєχυαℓ ρσℓутσρє@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    asks people to quit whining

    whines

    Anyway, I don’t really care about defederation enough to switch instances. But even if I did, you can’t deny that it’s annoying. When Lemmy introduces some nice way of migrating to other instances with userdata intact, then your rant will make sense. Without that, I don’t think it’s wrong if people complain.

  • bogdugg@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wonder if people would be interested in a “lurker” instance that disables comments/posts/etc. entirely. A “read-only” instance for the people who really hate the idea of being defederated, lol.

    • Riskable@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Quit your Whining” then proceeds to whine.

      Ackshually it was “quit the pseudointellectual whining” 😁

    • Senator Bum Cuckets@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s a paradox. If people around you are whining, you are somehow banned from speaking up and saying “stop”, as that is also whining. Truly, no one can crack this nut

  • meldroc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The people screaming about free speech for bigots & fascists seem to neglect the free speech of the instance owners and admins.

    They’re doing this out of the kindness of their hearts. Paying for bandwidth and servers. Donating their time to create the software, work out the kinks, and moderate the communities so we don’t strangle each other.

    From their perspective: Would you want to use your money and time to rebroadcast Nazism or similarly toxic ideology? Because that’s what they’re being asked, and most of them say “HELL NO!” When the chuds are demanding that these people rebroadcast such crap, it’s like they’re asking these admins to do a Hitler salute with them.

    This is their space. They have free speech rights too. That’s what curation is, free speech. You send a message by the choice of messages you rebroadcast or refuse to rebroadcast.

    • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The people screaming about free speech for bigots & fascists seem to neglect the free speech of the instance owners and admins.

      This is a pretty farcical argument, because the instance admins set things up specifically so that the instance users can discuss and vote on what the instance does.

      • crowlemo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That can be used by any authoritarian claiming to be the greatest good.

        It’s great to bully and censor but inevitably ends in subjugation.

        That’s the types that want this end up in very small circles or simply agreeing with whatever authority sells.

        • Djeece@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          As long as you have clear boundaries as to what’s acceptable or not, a population with critical thinking skills will always be able to tell what’s going on.

          I had this debate with a friend a while back. He said we should tolerate nazi flags because “what if the government decides the pride flag is a hateful flag”. Well, the nazi flag (at least coloquially) stands for “Kill all jews”, while the pride flag stands for “Be proud of your sexual orientation and gender identity”. One of these passes the hate speech/incitement test, the other doesn’t.

          There just needs to be consistent and well thought out rules in place. If it’s the case, I’m not scared of authoritarians using the paradox of tolerance to their advantage because it’s so transparent.

    • haltowork@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s what curation is, free speech.

      What in the everloving hell is this awful take. No, curation is not free speech. Nor does it need to be.

      • Miqo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Content moderation absolutely is a form of free speech. They get to decide who to associate with and what ideals to rebroadcast with their own equipment. They aren’t government entities and do reserve the right to express their individual beliefs. If you have a problem with that, find a better-suited instance for your own personal beliefs, or host your own.

        If you want further reading on the subject, here’s a well-written post that explains the positive relationship between more active content moderation and “freer” speech.

        • haltowork@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Amazing.

          “I’m censoring people so that I can promote free speech!”

          Just admit that it’s not free speech. That’s just a roundabout way to justify your decision when there’s no justification required.

            • haltowork@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I think you have issues with reading comprehension. I haven’t bitched anywhere about any defederation, moderation, censorship or whatever done by instance owners.

              Obviously, it’s up to them and can lead to better content. It can also lead to echo chambers, but that’s an implementation detail.

              All I did was point out that censorship is not free speech. Free speech is an ideal that doesn’t work in the real world, and it’s fine to admit you’re not open to everyone having free speech.

              • Cracks_InTheWalls@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Edit: You know what? You’re right - this was a poor response to your comment. I blame too much Agora and too little coffee. Will come back to this if I think of a better response more in line with the level you’re addressing (more general and philosophical sense).

                I do think curation is not necessarily censorship, and is itself a form of free expression when looking at all means a person can express themselves in a given society. [End of edit, slightly less but still kinda dumb comments remain below]

                I apologize - this was more of a general statement. “You’re free to build, or you’re free to complain, both are valid”. *Edit: And taking the recent hub-bub as a case in point re: the Fediverse stuff. Bleh, been a bit too meta recently.

                My issue was with curation not being free expression. This only holds for me if there are absolutely no other alternatives to express your ideas.

  • Trizza Tethis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The instance that works for me, sadly, is the instance that works on Jerboa and hasn’t defederated with any other instances.

    Which one is that?

    • mrpants@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, so?

      Jesus wasn’t a carpenter either. He was the son of a carpenter and that more likely translates better to day laborer. It was a reflection of his very humble origins. Being the son of a man in a trade (like a carpenter) would have put him more middle class.

      • Dash@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Jesus and his father were likely stone workers, not carpenters. The translations got jumbled up along the way.

        There historically was a stone quarry about a mile from where Jesus lived as a child. That area also wasn’t home to a lot of trees.

        There is also a lot of house and stone work parables in the his teachings, and references to corner stones multiple times.

        Jesus was a stone worker, not a wood worker. His name was also Yeshua, or “Joshua” as we know it today.

  • outplayed @lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The fun part of the fedi is seeing the instance drama. Where before everyone would just yell at the centralized platform corporation, and now we get to yell at the people directly who are trying to filter us out! Usually for good reason.

    • TacoNot@vlemmy.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think these growing pains are a necessity and look forward to seeing how the platform evolves.

    • Sarcastik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I predict a long road of “drama” before enough user join and indtance operators won’t be able to play these games anymore.

    • crowlemo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Except the user had actually more power to create a positive experience with heterogeneous content in the centralized Reddit than here.

  • Azz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you think regularly interacting with shit content somehow helps you stay out of an echo chamber then go ahead and make a second account on those garbage instances full of hateful people.

    So Beehaw has defederated from your home instance, are you implying that Beehaw is the “garbage instances full of hateful people”? Or are you saying that sh.itjust.works is and you tip your fedora to them for recognising it?

    Defederation is a powerful tool which will no doubt be abused, especially with lemmy in it’s infancy. I just hope that it isn’t abused to the point of completely fracturing the lemmyverse, further confusing new users until they just give up and make an account on the “meaverse” (or whatever facebook endup calling it)