• AteshgaRubyTeeth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can imagine buying this if you’re in an long distance relationship and into chastity.

    The company is the bad guy here, there’s no need to victim blame just because their kink doesn’t match yours.

    • Mandy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      im not saying the company isnt to blame, all im saying is a smart chastity belt is about the same level as a a smart shoe

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know, if that’s the kink, that’s the kink. It’s not harming anyone who didn’t consent to it, so why kink shame them when they’re the ones who have been wronged?

        • Mandy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          literally never said anything about their kink did i. Their kink doesnt matter, them buying a needlessly “smart” smartdevice does

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        A lot of kink relationships are long-distance. This sort of product appeals to someone in a kinky LDR.

    • nxfsi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Having a unique use case doesn’t mean it’s still not an incredibly stupid product. Same as with smart door locks, smart safes, smart guns and smart “full self driving” cars.