“WASHINGTON (AP) — A judge on Monday ruled that Google’s ubiquitous search engine has been illegally exploiting its dominance to squash competition and stifle innovation in a seismic decision that could shake up the internet and hobble one of the world’s best-known companies…”

      • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 month ago

        Also why? Searxng is a thing. I would argue search wouldn’t need to be federated. Makes sense for social media, web is already connected.

        • atro_city@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 month ago

          Isn’t searxng just a proxy for google and bing? Not sure how that “increases diversity” or “adds competition” or “improves search results”…

          • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            It can proxy anything you want to. There are a lot of searxng instances out there who have different setups. You could proxy only google or all the search engines that exist. Up to you. Ideally, I would make it so searxng can operate independently and have their own search engine algorithm but so far, this is the most open source and self hostable option available.

            • atro_city@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              That’s great an all, but it doesn’t change the market one bit. Nearly all “alternative” search engines are bing proxies already. When bing went down a month or so ago, many of those “alternatives” went down too. Even the ones that supposedly had their own indices. I know this because I was using an alternative that simply went down too.

              Searxng just serves as a proxy in front of a proxy.

          • montar@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            In fact it improves search results, when you have multiple search engines turned on searxng does some sorting or filtering thing and manages to filter out lots SEO crap and ads from search.

        • atro_city@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Had a look: it’s 20 years and maintained by one single dude. Do you think one dude could compete with google? He needs help, and a lot of it.

          • atro_city@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            No, I mean the tech behind it, not the concept. The bittorrent application is able to find a file to download from a bunch of other people. Not only the file itself, but parts of it. It’s a distributed search.

            • montar@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              torrents have trackers, special servers that keep track of who’s got which parts of a file.

            • doodledup@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              This works because it’s the same file just distributed. But in the case of search, every node would need to have the entire index of the web. If not, how would the client decide who’s index is better and which page rank fits better with the search? I really don’t see how this would work.