FreeBSD has supported Plasma for a long time, but on OpenBSD, it’s been a long time coming. I believe a KDE desktop hasn’t been available on OpenBSD since Plasma 4, perhaps even KDE 3.
FreeBSD has supported Plasma for a long time, but on OpenBSD, it’s been a long time coming. I believe a KDE desktop hasn’t been available on OpenBSD since Plasma 4, perhaps even KDE 3.
How insanely inefficient is OpenBSD that Plasma needs strong hardware there? https://nitter.net/sizeofvoid/status/1739774784848671105
OpenBSD itself is very lightweight. It’ll run perfectly fine with half a GB of RAM and a shitty single core computer from ten years ago. They still ship a floppy installer image as the bare minimum.
In comparison, Plasma is heavy. All of Plasma’s fancy features come at a performance cost, after all.
Yeah but that’s not the claim the OpenBSD developer made. The question was which notebook he would recommend now, not 10 years ago, and the reply was a strong one.
No, not by today’s standards. It runs fine on potato hardware.
deleted by creator
Average hardware of which era? Plamsa runs smoothly on a Steam Deck which is artificially power-contrained to preserve battery. Plasma Mobile is for phones.
@woelkchen
> Average hardware of which era?
2012 or so.
It’s almost 2024. Plasma runs fine on potatoe hardware by 2023/2024 standards. If Plasma on OpenBSD needs strong notebook hardware, it’s OpenBSD’s fault for being inefficient.