Wallpapers on phone are useless because apps are always full screen.
Who would pay for such thing?
Wallpapers on phone are useless because apps are always full screen.
Who would pay for such thing?
Aren’t they still cheaper if nobody uses them?
What are you on about? I use my PC on my TV all the times and I don’t have a single issue you describe. I just have it connected with Hdmi. The TV even turns on and off automatic if function activate.
Do you mean IDE? I’m confident your PC has S-ATA.
There’s IDE to SATA cards available for eight bucks.
I think that’s mainly a relic from the past. I didn’t have compability or driver issues for a long time.
Once the PC is set up, it’s as comfortable as a console. Setting the PC up to console standards is reduced to installing steam.
I have my camera and microphone deactivated on the OS level because Youtube and Spotify would show me things workmates mentioned way too often.
I didn’t notice it since.
Could still be a major coincidence though, the biggest of them.
Phh, people without food and work can go to the Venus X-enus mining company.
I think they were banned because they didn’t have a representative in the country that they could serve those allegations to.
I think we shouldn’t expect anything other than language from a language model.
How would it fail if it was within specs? Is it a design error you say?
I would bet it’s the same reason Boeing is currently going down, greed over safety.
I mean, how much can we trust SpaceX, when they try to tell us that exploding starships, that were said to land on mars at 2026, are a huge success?
Tbf, it might not even be greed, but trying to meet the impossible expectations musk seemingly makes up on the spot. It’s lies over lies with him, and SpaceX can only do so much to work around him.
You bring it up to specs before the next launch. If you can’t do that, you have to scrap it.
If it would be a good tool for privacy, Russia would try to shut it down the same way they did with Signal.
.
Source?
Goal posts are moved quite quickly here.
Not if there’s evidence against him.
Why would they sue the company when he is the criminal?
They’re all in in the insane race for dominance against each other. I doubt they rate quality that high right now. They want data fast to get money first.
I assume he was arrested because he is a russian asset.
Regardless, he was doing business in France and not following its laws. So the official reason still makes more sense than your fantasies.
Yes, companies should comply with law enforcement when their platform is evidently used for crimes.
Half of YouTube videos are written and read by AI these days. That will be a wonderful feedback loop if they train it on those videos.
.ml .ee