5·
7 days agoOn the other hand if there’s gonna be a challenge to the legality of arbitration agreements this is a strong place to start from.
the_post_of_tom_joad [any, any]
Sooner or later they’d get me for one thing if not for another…
[But if] a fellow ain’t got a soul of his own, just little piece of a big soul, the one big soul that belongs to everybody, then…Then it don’t matter. I’ll be all around in the dark – I’ll be everywhere.
- 0 Posts
- 5 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: September 5th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Damn, i had no idea she was this off her rocker.
I dig their cracks but i don’t follow the drama. Care to offer a primer on the soap opera?
71·4 months agoI already have me copy!
IANAL but i am wondering if Disney is somehow letting this case go as a backdoor way to legitimize arbitration agreements.
Like, i just can’t see Disney not knowing this is the wrong case to push the legitimacy of an arbitration agreement. But if this case somehow legitimized through whachacallit… precedent… that an arbitration agreement, while binding in a primary sense, is not binding for every Disney product, wouldn’t Disney (and really every company that uses binding arbitration as part of using their product) consider that a win?
Because as i understand it, arbitration agreements as a requirement to use a service is still an untested legal grey area. Anything legitimizing them at all would be a win… Right? Againn ianal