![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
It doesn’t necessarily mean that. It could also be that they attempt to block the rise of new platforms, and by doing so limiting the amount of platforms that they have to compromise.
It doesn’t necessarily mean that. It could also be that they attempt to block the rise of new platforms, and by doing so limiting the amount of platforms that they have to compromise.
I think technically what they sell is services related to RHEL and not it itself (correct me if I’m wrong).
To me at least, a big problem with it is the hypocrisy. RHEL started itself by repackaging another piece of software. Why is it not OK for others to do the same to them? Especially when the gpl license allows that, and requires them to allow that!
The Linux license allows anyone to distribute it for profit (under certain conditions). If I wanted to sell CDs with the Linux kernel I could. Wouldn’t be a good business, but I could.
Same
Would’ve never expected this read to be so interesting.
Regarding section 1, won’t you still get the conflicts when pushing to remote (or pulling from it)?
I now noticed that the post’s content differs between instances, sorry about that.
I could be wrong. I’d be happy to be shown wrong. Always room to learn.
Generally when I hear cyber security I think of things like data breaches, vulnerability research, malware analysis, netsec, appsec… Stuff like that.
I’m actually not really sure where I’d have posted. I remember seeing a meta community somewhere, maybe lemmy.world, where you can have discussions about Lemmy. But I’m really not sure.
And just to make it clear, I’m just giving you my honest opinion. Not trying to make you feel bad or anything.
How is is this cyber security related?
And it’s not P2P…
Jami is p2p for example. Direct communication between peers.
That’s not being pretentious, that’s being blunt. I personally as a dev, appreciate that.
If you think the code can be improved you should say that, and exactly why that’s the case. When you’re mistaken you should be able to take the criticism.
Your mission as a dev is to write the ideal code, and being overly polite can stand in the way of that.
Point it out explicitly in your resume. Don’t expect them to figure out your github activity on their own.
It’s definitely better to have open source experience than no experience.