![](https://sopuli.xyz/pictrs/image/0e9f2231-a1d5-4ded-915c-cabde6092a2c.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/h1ChnLuBHr.png)
Thank you very much for those insights!!
Thank you very much for those insights!!
Would you give your perspective anyway, as I would be quite interested, although I’m not the one you talked to?
Utter bullshit…
Because of all the nice feedback about OpenSUSE:
SUSE was my first (bought) Linux distribution, at a time when I would have spent days downloading an ISO, SUSE was available with a manual in store. That was nice.
But then I had an AVM Fritz! ISDN card and it was a complete shit show to get this working. Especially as YAST(2?) didn’t support the configuration I needed, but every time you opened it, it would overwrite your manual changes in some configuration files.
(Edit: I’ll probably need to add, that this was like 25 years ago. So besides “fuck, I’m old”, my perspective in SUSE is very probably not up-to-date)
After that I hopped through a few distros and mostly stayed with basic Debian.
Nowadays I’m mostly using Manjaro (or just Arch itself, if I don’t need X), because I like the Arch package system and actually also the whole system architecture… Don’t exactly know what it is, but I feel much more at home.
With apt I sometimes found myself in situations, where a fresh install will resolve things faster than trying to restore/save the system. With Arch I always was somehow able to restore everything.
Can someone tell me how Tumbleweed differs/excels?
Thanks in advance!
Currently waiting for my new laptop (Framework 16 :-D) and that would be a nice opportunity to try something new.
But as I need my device for work, it’s important to me, that I really have it under my control and am not depending on some half-baked configuration utility like YAST was.
Edit: I’m also playing with the thought of moving to something immutable. NixOS looked nice in concept, but the more I read about it, the more I see that it’s more suitable for more server than my laptop - but maybe I’m wrong here, as I don’t have any hands-on experience
Microsoft has built a number of safety features into Windows Recall to ensure that the service can’t run secretly in the background. When Windows Recall is enabled, it places a permanent visual indicator icon on the Taskbar to let the user know that Windows Recall is capturing data. This icon cannot be hidden or moved.
Oh my, that one is really cute
You probably shouldn’t go for the clit while driving
Maybe I’m wrong, but looks like cancer tissue
Yeah, Russia should just fuck off in Ukraine and no civilians would get hurt anymore
What has Wikileaks to do with Snowden?
And they say you a can’t have it all…
And will also mean better tracking of phone users, as we have a better resolution with more towers
Which isn’t a good thing always at least…
Yeah, it has the typical star shape on the top, plumbuses get, when they turn to fossils
What version(s) of Windows are affected?
Didn’t hear it it - and seldomly booting my windows…
Who is this single person controlling all the desktop environments and window managers? Oo
Yeah, but then I’ve a web exposed service and I want keep a low profile as possible with what I’m exposing. So I guess as long as there aren’t many users to manage, wireguard (or a tailscale configuration) could work out for OP
I’ve setup wireguard, because it’s only me and an employee using the services. But with that, externally I don’t even seem to have a port open. But wireguard is so fast to be online, that I’m just always connected as soon as I’m online - using a domain and an IP update script
Well, then you assume wrong
Linux just gives you the options. Under windows you’d be just sol
I’m currently thinking about what I should do with my monero. How do you pay daily stuff with it?
Lights in shoes that blink at each step were all the hype in my childhood