it doesnt have to be too heavy. a bag, a box, etc. yes obv i deal with the beeping but i still think its unnecessary. im not a child lol
it doesnt have to be too heavy. a bag, a box, etc. yes obv i deal with the beeping but i still think its unnecessary. im not a child lol
i though the same thing before reading other comments
am i required to also put the seatbelt down for the heavy object ? seems a bit unnecessary in both cases :/
ever needed to put something heavy in the passengers seat ? ever needed to move the car a short distance slowly ?
does that…help ?
edit: obviously it does; i misread the post.
dont conflate liberals with leftists
system of a d
systemd of a own
rage against the virtual machine
doesnt that kind of defeat the point ?
If it isn’t mandated, regulated, and enforced by law
and even then, dont be so sure…
if it is considering the average for all of history, then the rate of change would just have to be consistently greater than 0, right ?
photoshop, illustrator, etc are genuinely good programs though. the ‘linux alternatives’ just arent usually as powerful or easy to use.
this is coming from a linux and foss fanatic, btw. i dont use adobe, but i probably would if i was in a creative industry
interesting. which model phone?
“yes i would love to tar -xvjpf
my files”
– statement dreamed up by the utterly insane
…or shipping to MSDOS
often, yes, the same questions are made; but just as often the questions are set in different contexts or asked in different communities. regardless, technology and the opinions around it change, so some new discussions should be started regularly, if just to prevent information from stagnating.
the difference between asking a genuine question and those crude responses (and similarly, your comment), is that the question has a purpose: it sparks constructive conversation by inviting people to share their opinion, and the (helpful) responses ultimately benefit the asker. whereas the responses only exist to spite those looking for genuine answers; to waste their time and put them down. to reply like that benefits you only with a sense of superiority, at the cost of depreciating and sidetracking the discussion.
before you compare this chain to a toxic comment, realize that neither of us are reiterating dogma or making attacks at the other’s willingness to learn. i’m not saying what is being said here has never been said before, just that your average reader may very well take away new perspective from both arguments. and isnt that what discussion is all about ?
great comeback, really sells your point.