Nice metaphor, is it your original?
$argon2id$v=19$m=64,t=512,p=2$UYIBCdPUJek0ndf9GUcBtA$8C2G7+xwpPBiaoybb7ZjgA
Nice metaphor, is it your original?
Yuzu did not use “nintendo source code”.
They simply hosted decryption keys in their repository. But that still was not the focus of Nintendo’s move. It was that Yuzu and its company profited directly from the release of The Legend of Zelda.
2016 is a little far, isn’t it?
My HP printer is 15 years old and we are not changing it until it breaks.
We are used to refill cartridges with a ink syringe.
In this case, it is likely that they wanted to use his voice if the videos done in collaboration went particularly well. So the fact that it’s hus voice has a specific reason to be. This could hold as a claim, I think.
No, it wouldn’t stand in court.
Blocking ads is technically allowed by law, including copyright law in most countries I am aware of, while it’s against Youtube’s ToS.
Servo is going to fill that void
Some people care about privacy.
Blind people shouldn’t need to give up their privacy to Microsoft and Google to have a web page read to them.
Why are we not using them in end-user devices
Their distribution of books is completely legal.
Corporations just have more money to warp the laws in their favour.
That’s why the Archive is appealing: they still believe they are right.
Wikipedia requires attribution, which AI scrapers never give.
It is “public” work, but under a license.
Then maybe it shouldn’t grow.
It seems a very valid reason to give up your privacy.
Hungary will have the presidency, not the total control. They propose discussions but the vote in the Council is still majority based.
It’s brigading when you don’t like their opinion.
Go vote what left parties in your country think about it. It’s likely the same.
Not everyone wants to deal with that (setting up payment methods, filling tax forms, …)
So you wish that all corporations shouldn’t pay their developers at all, because MIT licence exists?
Intel Management Engine improve no one’s life.
It is very sad how you don’t see that “forced openness” is good for everyone.
If guns are sold legally, it means that there is the assumption that everyone buying them has good intentions.