![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
This is a bug, not enshittification. How would they profit from that?
This is a bug, not enshittification. How would they profit from that?
Germany is one of the countries against the current chat surveillance proposal, so at least we have that going for us (which is nice)
They created WordPad because of antitrust issues and never changed it. Try opening a Word document created by a recent version, it’s pretty useless today.
Notepad rules though, it even got UTF8 support recently-ish! /s
I get why they do it though - any change to win10 needs testing and so on and might not be welcomed by the user base. You can always download a free (as in freedom) image editor, some are even on the Microsoft Store. Be glad they did not backport all the bad sides of win11…
I was talking about the history on device, of course I agree: never expect privacy on a device controlled by someone else.
I can confirm there are places where that is possible.
Also as long as they do not whitelist executables, you could use a portable version of a browser.
I think it’s free but you have to buy or bring a domain