yeah, some title gore going on here.

really? you’re supposed to know it’s not Minnesota. SUCH AS AMERICANS.

but I guess you grokked the comment like an average American so there’s that.

welcome, but maybe consider not using the world instance. it is pretty saturated and the point is to spread users out across many instances instead of having one monolithic one

I’m not even sure I understand what that means. is it a diss on America for being too privileged?

there’s a time and place for it. if it’s a conversation about detailed opinions then no. but when someone basically asks for a simple definition then yes.

title-and-post-gore!

one of the many amazing details!

I’ve seen some doozies in my time but this one takes the cake. should probably be a community for it.

why OP gotta use a 3 panel layout when the pictures are just repeats of the same picture?

correctly, so

thanks. now I don’t have to say it.

duh.

the point of saying allowed is that consumers and the market in general should not put up with it.

ooh one news article for one incident reaaaaaaly proves your point that some unknown entity was trying to go full fascist and trump stopped them!

or did you watch one emotionally charged youtube video and then adopt this logically bankrupt theory ever since?

grasping the implication here is an extreme challenge. what are you suggesting? that individual cops were trying to go full-fascist and control the population by using the guise of a global pandemic to illegally stop and question citizens? if it wasn’t the government currently in power, then who was trying to go full-fascist? what entity between the government and police was it? and why was this only an american symptom when the pandemic was global?

all that to say - this take is complete nonsense and clearly lacks the application of the most basic of critical thought.

if you think evidence in your own life makes something objectively better for others then you have no idea what objective means.

the problem is that your clearly believe your way of thinking is better for everyone else. it is better FOR YOU. full stop. you are welcome to share what works FOR YOU. but your attitude that it is objectively better for everyone else is not something you could possibly know. and your insistence that it is better whether anyone accepts that or not is strong evidence of your lack of maturity and life experience.

we’re not suffering and you’re not a savior. stop trying to impose your way of thinking on a bunch of people. that’s one of the very first things one needs to learn in life to not be an insufferable person. i suppose the irony is that I was once like that and have learned to stop. but I can recognize it in an instant.

what you’re failing to pick up on is that no one cares about how you handle your thoughts and you can stop talking about yourself as if we should all aspire to think the way you do. this thread has largely been about the shared experience of having what we call intrusive thoughts and you coming here and trying to hijack that by telling us we are doing it wrong was never going to be well received.

there’s only one person looking the fool around here.