Back in the day it was a very think pane of glass that I couldn’t really harm. Now, I do not punch the monitor.
Back in the day it was a very think pane of glass that I couldn’t really harm. Now, I do not punch the monitor.
This is a great example terrible AI writing.
Pretty sure that with a permissive license you can just change the license of future versions as you want. Ex. v1 MIT license with thousanda.of contributors, v2 Commercial license with contributions from anyone who agrees to contribute to the new version and license. (Anyone can fork v1 and start their own licensed project)
Did they try Stack overflow?
My rebuttal to this is (they usually include murder as the bad thing being done), “Are you telling me fear of hell is the only thing keeping you from murdering me right now? Says a lot more about your morals than mine.”
Well, I’m sure they are worried about their new deal with IBM that they’ve obviously been working on for a while.
Gonna assume controlled burns in difficult terrain.
Just give me a magnet, a needle and an hd platter
I find the experience of the applicants to be hilarious lies.
Really I think it’s kind of the opposite. There are plenty of jobs awaiting higher skilled labor. Just as Excel didn’t hurt accounting, it gave many people who weren’t trained I’m accounting to take on more tasks than they would have.
I’ve heard it as “No one is losing their job to AI, but they will lose their jobs to someone who is using AI.”
My guess,
Oh yeah, thank you
I believe partly because it takes over so many responsibilities that it becomes a requirement for things that don’t need to require it. Plus it diverged from the Linux principle of do only one thing.
Also, afair, it was buggy for a while.
Trash in/trash out. Small communities of experts can create quality content, but after becoming relevant enough astroturfing begins.
Pretty sure that’s an air pistol and firing an actual pistol like that (assuming something big enough actually blow a head off) would do weird things to her shoulder.