![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
WHY IS NO ONE STANDING UP FOR GIF?!
WHY IS NO ONE STANDING UP FOR GIF?!
This is the reason. Releasing it would invalidate it.
Are we not saying exactly the same thing?
If you get an idea from a song, you are 1000% free to turn that into new art. This is the fair use argument.
I mean, that’s kinda circular isn’t it? Them being happy, being why the stock goes up.
PSA: When chewing on cables, unplug them first.
(Unless you like them spicy)
Is the argument they should have gotten a better deal?
Lemmy welcomes you, new ex-redditors.
Well, I’ve had DLs in multiple states and they all required fingerprints. The little digital ones. Maybe that’s not the case everywhere though.
As I said. They already have it.
However, jammers are illegal to use in the U.S.
What is the point of adding this bit for an article about burglaries?
I’m okay with the TSA scan (pre-check) since… you know… they already have you if you took a picture for your ID.
Those “clear” people however. Who TF thinks it’s a good idea to hand your biometric info to a corp?
I’m still sullen about napster. It didn’t change anything about music sharing- other than to take music sharing into the spotlight. I.e., they got greedy and gained the attention of the media.
Uh. This is not a good picture my journalism dudes. It’s strap-on; what kind of tasks are we talking about here?
Just because you click on it that doesn’t make it accurate. More importantly, that text isn’t “clickable”, so they can’t be measuring raw engagement either.
It’s not A/B testing if they aren’t getting feedback.
LMG says they didn’t do a thing
Yes, please show me this language.
And I never said I was waiting for proof, thanks. Feel free to read the whole thing.
I really key in on the language of these types of releases. First is,
To ensure a fair investigation, LMG did not comment or publicly release any data and asked our team members to do the same.
So… keeping yo mouth shut is not ensuring a “fair investigation.” It’s protecting yourself.
Next, phrases like,
Claims of bullying and harassment were not substantiated.
Is not proof of anything- other than there was no proof. That’s why you hire a third party to speak for you. Instead of you saying, “I didn’t do it,” (which of course almost anyone would - true or not) the “independent” investigator can say, “I didn’t find any proof.”
The strongest language here,
Allegations that sexual harassment were ignored or not addressed were false.
…is interesting. I guess it depends on what they mean by “addressed.” If I slapped a colleague on the back and said, “That was hilarious!”, I hardly ignored it. You could even say I addressed it.
I’m not saying I believe I’ve way or the other. All I’m pointing out is this means basically nothing.
I’ve heard the early Internet age referred to as the future dark ages. When all the work, information and content is digitized, it’s prone to being lost to history forever.
So… what would happen?
I know you watched.