I’m complaining to you about censoring. Without your permission. Because we’re on the internet. Censorship is fucking stupid. Take a new screenshot.
I can’t force anyone to uncensor a post, but I can be annoying in the comments if they don’t.
At this rate, my entire comment history is just going to be mini freakouts about fucking cunts censoring “fucking cunt” on the internet. We’re allowed to be dicks here. Talking about dicks is fine.
Don’t bend over backwards to make this space advertiser friendly. Be weird!
Unpopular opinion: Gnome software is pretty solid, and if your computer usage patterns overlap with their design, it is quite a lovely DE. I’d rather have something that works well, even if it doesn’t do everything under the sun.
This requires an Apple iPhone XR or newer, as the face scan utilizes the TrueDepth sensor.
I’d rather take a plaster mold of my face than have to use a specific phone to order a VR headset.
Here’s a language that does bash and Windows batch files: https://github.com/batsh-dev-team/Batsh
I haven’t used either tool, so I can’t recommend one over the other.
That’s absolutely true. What’s hard and what’s easy in programming is so completely foreign to non-programmers.
Wait, you can guess my password in under a week but you can’t figure out how to pack a knapsack?
Right? That’s the thing. Car thieves don’t care if the tool is illegal; they’re already planning on stealing a car.
If you make the tool illegal, you’re just making it harder for security experts who do care about the law.
Corrupted initramfs?
Yes we should allow them, because the problem isn’t that this tool is available. The problem is that cars and other devices aren’t more secure.
If you broke into a bank vault with a screwdriver, you don’t ban screwdrivers; you get mad at the bank.
You use cards for offline authentication (bars/festivals/etc.), and use a different process for online authentication.
Proving someone has the physical card in their possession (which is what a reader does) isn’t really useful for proving identity when you can’t also check the picture.
Pine and BeagleBoard have some decent options, but they’ll always be more expensive than rpi because of the economy of scale.
This doesn’t hold. Commit signature is a feature of git itself, even though the article chooses to focus on GitHub. And afaik github integration of signatures doesn’t break code hosting elsewhere, GH merely allows you to register your GPG signature with them so they’re able to validate the commits, but the author is still able to enroll the same GPG key to other hosts.
Not only that, but GitHub rewrites signatures on rebase (and sometimes on fast forward merge) with their own private key. Using signatures on GitHub is basically pointless.
TIL! Guess I saw the reverse once, and it’s stuck with me. Carry on.
Has the meaning of this template changed? Like isn’t the pink guy supposed to be a thing supporting the white dude so they can accomplish a goal they couldn’t have done alone?
For example, the pink guy could be “Debian”, the white person “Ubuntu”, and the yellow goal “Being an awesome distribution”.
I recently discovered emerge --jobs 8 --load-average 8
instead of just make -j8
. Not gonna help much on a 900MHz pentium, but it has really sped up my build times.
And? You believe Meta/Google should have waited to block links?
Using your shared libraries is always a good thing, no? Like your distro’s packages should always have the latest security fixes and such, while flatpaks require a separate upgrade path.
Access to your entire filesystem, however, I agree with you on.