Musk couldn’t care less about free speech. He has implemented a policy that bans you for using the word “cisgender” while he responds to nazi propaganda with personal admiration.
Musk couldn’t care less about free speech. He has implemented a policy that bans you for using the word “cisgender” while he responds to nazi propaganda with personal admiration.
Civilians? Never heard of 'em!
As if they’ll lower the price once they’ve recouped the R&D costs ten times over.
What? So just because I happen to agree with your stance, I also have to concede that there’s such a thing as objective morality?
Morality is subjective by definition.
Jokes on you, I’m into that shit.
I don’t trust some billionaire with a direct interface into my neural abilities. I know Musk had no problems using his satilites to sabotage Ukraine’s army to appease Putin.
A brain implant could be a solution for people with brain damage or born deficits that help them regain lost abilities.
I would never have one implanted as a luxury gadget though.
As any sane legislator will do. Having to show your face or ID to watch porn is some Orwellian level government control. It’s the parents job to regulate their children’s internet activity.
You don’t have to sue them. Suing a multinational company will bankrupt you. Let the data protection authority handle this.
GDPR fines can scale to a company’s yearly revenue. They can absolutely get in more trouble than it’s worth if they keep blatantly shitting on the GDPR. Keep reporting them whenever you see these violations.
There’s a really low bar for what is considered personal data. If they collect location data coupled to an “anonymous” ID, it’s still personal data, because it shows you moving to your house and place of work every day. If you can infer a person’s identity from the data, it’s personal data.
So yeah them collecting your personal e-mail address and refusing to delete it is a clear violation of the GDPR.
A psychopath
Alternarive title: new generations are so utterly fucked that they’re forced to work multiple jobs to earn the right to survive in the dystopian hellscape that’s been created before their birth.
He made a thousand dollar donation in support of proposition 8, a constitutional amendment in California that strips gay people of the right to marry. He then proceeded to argue that such a donation does not make him a bigot or an enemy of LGBTQ+ people, because he’s a delusional piece of filth.
This effectively prevented gay people from marrying in California from 2008 to 2013 until the fascists that supported it were finally done trying to argue how this doesn’t violate the US constitution.
So yeah, may he, his browser, and any pathethic excuse that pretends to be human being who supported this abomination rot in the deepest depths forever.
The fact that their founder wants to ban gay marriage is enough reason for me to avoid it like the plague.
Calm down, no one’s getting exploited. Many people like trying out new features that aren’t available yet for stable releases.
It’s because the research in question used a really small and unrepresentative dataset. I want to see these findings reproduced on a proper task collection.
ArXiv papers are never peer reviewed.
The concept of speaking freely is not exclusive to legislation. Musk specifically bought this platform because, according to himself, he saw it as an important place for human discourse and the freedom to speak your mind was being inhibited by the policies around moderation. Which is ironic because he implements policies that ban you for speaking out over arbitrary topics while the previous policies simply banned hate speech.