![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/84b25fb7-44d7-4c99-9e1b-dc9f2801e33f.jpeg)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/d82718c7-5579-4676-8e2e-97b4188f10d3.png)
Could have little tiny proto shrew cheese curds.
Could have little tiny proto shrew cheese curds.
Part of it, too, is selective breeding (aka genetic modification, but that’s a dirty word).
https://www.bhg.com/news/brussels-sprouts-less-bitter/
Edit: I may be misinformed. I thought selective breeding was technically considered GM, but it sounds like only editing outside of breeding might be what qualifies. Didn’t mean to make this post about technicalities, just meant to point out that genetics has also played a part in arguably more palatable plants.
Combine that with the stupid piped-in engine noise (through the sound system) and you can make anyone feel right at home in last century’s technology.
Am I understanding this correctly? NOLA was arguing that, since they tax satellite radio for listeners in their city, they should be able to tax internet streams for the same listeners? If so, I feel like the two things should be comparably applicable (if it weren’t for the ITFA), but also fuck all the way off, NOLA government. Get fucked, seriously.
I hitched my horse to just what I consider the basics–zip and unzip–and that has made it easy for me. But I’ve been stuck on those.
Extract anything:
tar xf <archive_file>
Create a tbz2 archive:
tar cjf <archive_file.tbz2> <stuff to put in it>
(And tossing in a -v
is pretty universal, if that’s your thing.)
Some day, instead of commenting on a reddit Lemmy post, I think I’ll Google how to tell it to use .xz
.
Ok, you know what? Today is finally that day. It’s just capital -J
instead of lower-case -j
! That’s easy enough to remember, I guess.
I feel so lucky to have been here for this discussion today.
What would give them standing? They’d have to be an entity protected by the constitution to claim that protection was harmed. Is it this (Wikipedia)?
TikTok Ltd was incorporated in the Cayman Islands and is based in both Singapore and Los Angeles. source
I guess I’ve never thought about what makes an entity have rights here. Buckingham Palace couldn’t just open shop here and start suing our government, right?
“it’s a car, not a church.”
I remember seeing a documentary or news piece or something about a woman who pivoted hers to “BISCUIT!” I really hope that was real. But I don’t remember how she got there, like if she had to trick herself that “biscuit” was offensive.
But is it a dead name? Last I looked, the URL was still “twitter.com”.
Cookie Monster in a toilet.
I want:
Yeah, I remember learning about it in a CS class and, specifically, the claim that it’s an ideal standard candle kind of image. I always wondered if we couldn’t have found a better reference shot of a smooth flower growing in front of a rough stone or something.
Always has been.
Many people dislike their own names, but I think SomeGuy69 is an awesome name, too. Cheer up!
Well, careful there, ZZ
is like :wq
; ZQ
is like :q!
.
And the thing about regulation like this is that it just resets the bar height for everyone. It’s not like this doesn’t apply to all competitors.
Unless we mean non-cable competition, i.e. streaming. Maybe that’s not under the jurisdiction of FCC? If not, though, then I have to wonder why this has to be an FCC thing in the first place. This is about truth in advertising, in general.
“Glorious leader” sure sounds like a pretty direct reference to the Kim dynasty.
I’ve felt like Tidal has behaved exactly like Spotify in my use so far (which has only been a couple of months). I was doing side-by-side comparison of playing, adding to the queue, inserting next in queue, etc., and it all seemed to behave exactly the same.
edit: Oh, yeah, I only compared Windows, Mac, and Android.
Source code escrow is a thing, too. I’ve only seen it in the context of (as I understood it) protection against going out of business, but perhaps it could apply to discontinued products, as well?