![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://aussie.zone/pictrs/image/7f3e194c-89d7-4b60-a6d6-4bd4f14fa575.jpeg)
or simply inconveniencing them though
Screwing. 100% screwing.
An inconvenience is not being able to get someone on the phone in minutes or hours. Screwing is making someone spend days, weeks or months trying to get you on the phone and navigate a system that’s supposed to help them, not hurt them.
My dad isn’t at pension age yet and has been struggling the last few years whilst being a full time carer of my grandmother. It has often taken days to weeks of calling to get through and weeks to months get things approved.
Whereas, there are so many services we have that are for ACTUAL emergencies, and require fast service, where the money would save lives.
You have this so backwards.
Centrelink saves lives. Support saves lives. Welfare saves lives.
If you don’t support people then they end up having to use the emergency services. Is it cheaper to support people before the need emergency services rather than after. You can’t house all the unemployed, disabled, pensioners, veterans (and other people I’ve probably forgotten) in emergency wards, these people don’t magically end up fed, housed and cared for if make Centrelink and related services a nightmare to deal with.
My dad has been keeping my grandmother out of hospital. She’s now in a nursing home, funded mostly by government, that is keeping her out of hospital. It is extremely costly to put her in a hospital bed.
Are these companies worth the suffering of vulnerable gamblers?