Not my problem anymore.
I think it looks elegant. Nice. I will keep using CTRL + [insert number here], though.
Can anybody post some pictures?
I’m uninformed on this matter but it’s on “Studies” for me.
Aren’t “Studies” just a fancy term for “limited rollout”? So I assume Mozilla controls them. Therefore I don’t think it’s a value in about:config
. I might be wrong though.
Tried it. Loved it. Looks sleek and buttons make navigation much easier.
I love corporate marketing talk
There’s so little news about Valve that anything is worth writing an article about, apparently.
I really hope that there is a logical reason for Mozilla’s stupid choices. Because I can’t think of one.
You could swap out the Firefox shortcut on their home screen with an ‘open Google(.)com in Firefox’ shortcut.
That’s what I will do.
I already did. And they “don’t like” it. They want to see the Google logo for some reason.
That’s the Privacy Badger. I love using it aswell.
I can’t speak for the privacy scene but in my country it’s pretty popular merely because of anonimity (which boils down to not having to use a phone number) and Discord-like server/groups. For porn and other NSFW content, it is pretty popular.
It is Google’s. Google uses it on Google products that aren’t Android. Such as Google Chrome for PC. It got a MD3 update.
Edited the image link to point to the correct one.
I’m pretty sure the reason why it doesn’t use Material Design is to protect it’s own branding. Material Design is Google’s after all.
It’s usually a plain text that says “Access Denied” on a blank page.
Assuming they have moderators of course.
I personally think this might be a “vote with your vallet” situation. Signaling to Google (and to other manufacturers) that people appreciate openness in their smartphones. Knowing Google though, it’s unlikely they will get it.
Read Only Memory
Oops. Sorry mate. I’ll edit that out now.
This seems pointless. So what if “women are less likely to adopt this new technology”? What’s the point? And how does one “master” AI even?