Which is the propaganda? The posts touting Chinese achievements in tech, or the posts saying to beware of the Chinese milestones?
Both.
Which is the propaganda? The posts touting Chinese achievements in tech, or the posts saying to beware of the Chinese milestones?
Both.
Doesn’t this mean that overwhelming non factual information would skew the results of chat gpt?
That’s from Draggin Ballz
That’s funny because I just cancelled my Netflix.
I’ll shill for brother because it’s cheap, they don’t lock out generic cartridges, prints well on the network from Linux, and seem to last.
What they are missing on compared to HP is parts support. However, the comparable HP printer with parts support is twice the price and the parts are almost the cost of a new cheap printer.
Lexmark is okay too, I guess.
Why do you think all this legislation is floating around about protecting our children?
Hint, it’s motivated by protecting someone’s profits.
Banks will charge for record searched, FYI.
I immediately thought of tubgirl.
Spy xFamily spoiler:
:::Spy situation happened. Major change of plans and they can’t go into public. The excuse was that the husband pooped his pants.:::
This article is an ad for the site formerly known as Twitter. Is seemed to source an the information from tweets, but needed to inform us that each comment came from the dead bird site.
Ironically, I do not.
Duh, you should make it say things like an Osakan should.
Thanks. It’s good to hear someone outline what I was thinking. I’m frustrated that the support response made it sound like we shouldn’t be using the software, but I guess I’ll get over it.
I suspect most of it leans heavily on ghostscript, so they are required to provide AGPL. They would like to obtain support contracts, so support requests are considered out of compliance unless they are paid. I find it interesting that they basically have AGPL+ were plus is whatever they have on their license page in addition to AGPL.
That’s how I feel. I’m not a legal expert either. The caveat to this is that there is a disclaimer on the legal page where you are directed to the AGPL that says that you may not, “Use PDFCreator within an application or service that is not licensed under the terms of the AGPL.”
I’m assuming using the software in a Windows environment is allowed as it is distributed as a Windows application. If you are using the software to accept print jobs to PDF in a manner configurable through the default UI without modifying the code or default files, I’m also hard pressed to call it a violation, regardless of the input application.
I think that the concern from PDFForge is that we were asking for assistance with a feature, which crosses the line in any sort of professional setting.
This is how I expected FOSS to function. If you get a chance, check out their license page, which directs prospective users to the AGPL and also has further restrictions on what users may not do.
deleted by creator
100% how I read their license page. It isn’t like we are using it within another application, just literally using it as advertised. Unfortunately, the email came off as advising us that the software isn’t intended for use without a business license so we are now investigating other options.
I didn’t see that. I got Oops All Asians when generating gay furry Nazis on Bing.
To answer further questions, it was in response to a post about how Russians are said to view Ukrainian.