![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/pictrs/image/a18b0c69-23c9-4b2a-b8e0-3aca0172390d.png)
If the admin are in cahoots with the crypto mining douchebag, then no part of the site is safe.
If the admin are in cahoots with the crypto mining douchebag, then no part of the site is safe.
So when does Kevin Costner get to sue James Cameron for his lazy copy of Dances With Wolves?
Text based social media will never work. I don’t want to hear your thoughts, I just want to see you dance.
The losses were spurred by a Wall Street Journal investigation into lead-sheathed cables installed by phone companies across the US many decades ago.
The industry started phasing out lead in the 1950s, but the WSJ said it found evidence of more than 2,000 lead-covered cables and said there “are likely far more throughout the country.”
Fan-fucking-tastic. Y’all excited to bail out the telcos again?
De nada.
I’m assuming it’s this article.
This shit rubs me the wrong way, dude. Everybody gets rushed into taking pictures with each other at these events and I don’t think that’s justification to smear someone’s reputation by connecting them to Elon Musk.
Not really? Every country is spying on every other country. It’s just a big failure on our end.
Yeah, but I also want to get rid of Facebook. Like I don’t think every nation is entitled to their own toxic hell site.
Funny, “Space Karen” is a really common name for Elon.
I think they already have.
I’m not a policy expert, author of the bill, or in charge of the department that will lead these investigations. Even if I were an expert on the subject, what I’d do and what this department will do aren’t likely to be the same.
I just support civilian oversight and audits of these algorithms and LLMs as they take up a more prominent position in hiring and firing.
It’s a flag, not the entire investigation. If something seems suspicious, that’s the queue to investigate, not just immediately slap cuffs on someone.
When the demographics of the output are roughly equivalent to the demographics of the input. If ten men and fifty women apply, and eight men and two women are hired, that is worth investigating.
I figure you’d audit it by examining the results, and if bias isn’t detectable in the results then I’d argue that’s at the very least still better than the human-based systems we’ve been relying on up til now.
You have evidence this is happening on Spotify’s Discover Weekly playlist?
I believe it started with this.
And it’s not even a kitchen sink. Couldn’t even do that right.
I was convinced OP had made a typo.