Pull and peel twizzlers are 10x’s better than regular twizzlers. I will not be taking any questions.
Pull and peel twizzlers are 10x’s better than regular twizzlers. I will not be taking any questions.
Umm, akshually, there would be a number of options to try first, depending on the circumstances:
It’s a leash that connects to the paddle board, but that was my first thought too.
I guess it depends on the employer. I don’t do office work myself, but according to what I’ve heard from my wife about her jobs in banking adjacent fields, she has a few different queues of things to do that everyone takes from.
The way you phrased this could go either way: were you never taking on more work, no matter how obviously it needed to get done, just because you weren’t explicitly told to do that job? Because that would be a fair criticism in my estimation.
That’s not what they are saying at all. They’re saying small vehicles aren’t even safe in crashes with other small vehicles, let alone with bigger vehicles.
Mind explaining why?
Obviously, it would still be stacked against the employee, but the biggest thing would be that the person under investigation could sue the law firm and hurt the law firm and their client through social media or by encouraging unionization if there was any proof of misconduct during the investigation.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but that was only one user who made that comparison, and they got downvoted hard for that.
It’s probably easier for law enforcement if those kinds of people are all in one place.
Just because you shouldn’t trust them doesn’t mean you’re not allowed to interact with them. It just means you need to be careful.
Learning how they lost is useful information in of itself. And even losers could probably tell you things like how quickly the other side could respond, what kind of equipment they used, basic lessons learned, etc.
“Only” 1 in a hundred Americans are PhDs? Thats far higher than I would have expected.
That’s neat but it also seems a bit bulky.
This is too perfectly cringe for this to be real, right? Right?
Here’s the explanation of the physics they gave:
Each nanowire was less than one-thousandth the diameter of a human hair, wide enough that an airborne water molecule could enter, but so narrow it would bump around inside the tube. Each bump, the team realised, lent the material a small charge, and as the frequency of bumps increased, one end of the tube became differently charged from the other.
"So it’s really like a battery,” says Yao. “You have a positive pull and a negative pull, and when you connect them the charge is going to flow.”
Too true…