Your thoughts are dirty and you should feel ashamed you disgusting sinner!
Or something, idk they might as well be religious
Your thoughts are dirty and you should feel ashamed you disgusting sinner!
Or something, idk they might as well be religious
I imagine men will start behaving differently right around the time your head becomes unlodged from your ass.
Showing yourself in public ≠ posting pictures of yourself online. I understand that, for the terminally online, these things are interchangeable. I am sorry to inform you of this, though it’s probably valuable that you learn it now, but they are not.
This isn’t victim blaming. This is cause and effect.
How fucking dare that creepy disgusting old man look at pictures of young, beautiful
womenQUEENS on a platform where they’re posting pictures of themselves! This isn’t what the internet is meant for, how dare he!
Hmm
Edit: I just had to edit it, to really hammer home the mockery.
Objectifying women is wrong, but - c’mon. This is the internet, you post pictures of yourself on it and don’t know the consequences? That’s on you, or your parents if you’re below a certain age.
Well, it’s stated at the end of the paragraph that the about me was written by ChatGPT.
No I think it’s pretty clear that capitalism will point guns at them, and we will either win and exploit their resources for ourselves or die.
Squelch in my ass
Disastrous, even
It’s a circle jerk, don’t get fooled into thinking this is some new version of trickle down economics
You mean to say it’s stigmatized as a bad thing, and I’d accept that.
There’s an apple called Cosmic Crisp that has to be the worst thing I’ve seen come from the Honeycrisp variant of apple. Genuinely just awful taste and texture, like it’s got sand in it.
That being said, these are only a problem at supermarkets. Farmers markets are hard carries and don’t typically have the ‘grown for shelf life’ produce you see at your typical Walmart.
That’s nice
Purge the bowels, cleanse the soul
Idk, I don’t think they’re that blurry if we compare them to similar “conundrums” in other unethical circumstances.
Like, would you think the same of someone owning child porn? They don’t distribute it, they don’t film the children themselves, they just own the recordings. The law says they’re a criminal, but it seems like a similar ethical conundrum - no? (To be clear, I think eating meat sourced from someone who did not consent is wrong. I hope that says enough about how I feel about CP.)
How about owning the schematics for a ghost gun? You haven’t printed it, you haven’t distributed the schematic - you just own the schematic (and, for the purpose of the example, a 3d printer capable of printing the parts needed).
Seems like the answer is “it’s unethical”. Gonna need a third party to weigh in.
I feel very badly for your poor colon.
Excuse you, that’s Wide Argentinia
You are either:
giving your cat a toxic substance
giving something with the intellectual capacity of a 3 year old weed
Both are toxic. You’re a bad person.
Ratio’d.
Not to mention, your cat has the intelligence of maybe a 3 year old. You’re sitting here arguing about whether or not it’s toxic to give weed to a cat when it has the ability to consent as much as a 3 year old does.
Enjoy whatever you enjoy, IDC - you’re a bad person for exposing your cat to the smoke, moreso that you’re doing it with the intent of getting it high whilst ignoring the potential downsides.
Testing? You expect this person to consider testing?
That’s an extra step that will realistically lead to more work! That’s outrageous, can’t have that. Just won’t do.
Before they started realizing they need to pay attention
Coffee infused hot dog. Yeah, I’ve thought about it and that’s fucking awful.