![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/5f0d42f6-23dd-401e-b9be-b22225a91679.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/h1ChnLuBHr.png)
Privacy? What is this article talking about. Ads not displaying in no way implies privacy. They will harvest your data as much as it possibly can either way. All you are doing by paying to remove ads is directly funding the ad business model.
Privacy? What is this article talking about. Ads not displaying in no way implies privacy. They will harvest your data as much as it possibly can either way. All you are doing by paying to remove ads is directly funding the ad business model.
It sounds like the latency is really important here and not necessarily the bandwidth. That makes sense.
I can already burn through my entire wireless data limit in minutes. What is the point in it being faster without data being cheaper? At least from a users perspective and not someone who owns a telecommunications company.
Is there a way to update from within Cinny?
I’m not convinced we have even begun to scratch the surface in developing AGI. I’m also not convinced it is even possible using conventional computer hardware.
I do remember that. I suppose not enough people would ever use it for things to ever balance out.
I want to see a website that links to whatever is the least viewed Wikipedia article at any given time until all Wikipedia articles basically have the same number of views.
Wow, $80. I haven’t looked into these devices since the first one, but I thought the point of them was to be very cheap. I do wonder what these new more powerful ones are capable of. Perhaps the performance justifies the price.
I don’t think there is a better tool for web automation. Selenium is pretty much the industry standard. However, you can use Selenium across a wide variety of languages and browsers.
Also the device is in a condition that makes this difficult like not turning on or the screen being broken.
Does that not suggest that Xbox game pass is not very successful?
They have probably already sold the information 100 times.
That’s a fine opinion, but I happen to disagree.
Somehow? Paying to remove ads is rewarding ads thus causing more ads in the world. It’s not mysterious at all.
There are plenty of ways to not make it an all or nothing service, but that is at least the most straight forward. You could potentially give some of it away and then have to pay for the rest. Or have some stuff for free and more premium content is paid for. Or perhaps based on bandwidth with video quality / resolution.
Anything that is not ads is going to be an improvement.
Paying to remove ads is part of the ad business model. Upset your customer enough until they give you money to make it stop. Once you pay to remove the ads you have rewarded them for implementing ads which lets them know that implementing ads was a great way at making money.
So YouTube premium is not another model. It is the same model. Another model is paying for a service that never had ads at all such as NebulaTV or CuriosityStream.
It is at least a different problem, but adding in the element that any failure is a fatal one it just isn’t enough that there are less obstacles in the way.
Agreed. I already don’t trust car automation. No way I’m going to add a 3rd dimension to the list of possible failures.
I wonder if they mean optical instead of image here. It would make a lot of sense if that were the case.
What is a laser image transmission? Is the laser an image that is transmitting data within that image or is it a laser that is transmitting data in the form of images? 😐
I choose death.