Looks like “The Complete Book of Magic and Witchcraft” by Kathryn Paulsen.
Looks like “The Complete Book of Magic and Witchcraft” by Kathryn Paulsen.
Vertical Integration.
WARNING: Dunkin Donuts can expose you to chemicals including Dihydrogen Monoxide, which is known to the State of California to cause cancer. For more information go to www.P65Warnings.ca.gov.
I love my cigar, too, but I take it out of my mouth once in a while.
Hey I’ve seen this movie before… https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_and_the_Holocaust
You sound like a guy who knows which part of a warplane to reinforce.
Over surprised guy.
Will build a creature
Double feature
Kim Kitsuragi.
It’s kind of like suspension of disbelief. Comes from pro wrestling. It’s a lot like pretending Santa is real when you’re 13 and know it’s not.
Looks like tandoori chicken, but on a grill.
She deserves nothing less for spelling it as “weening”.
The stars at night Are big and bright Clapclapclapclap Cause we got rolling blackouts
Which clause of the legislation provides for moving on to a new standard, short of new legislation?
How quickly will a standard be updated if the mandate encourages companies to entrench on the current standard? Industries built around the legislative certainty of the current standard may exert influence to inhibit moves to new standards, even if there are good reasons to move on.
What if we had mandated, by law, that all monitors must use the VGA connector in 1995? Would that have made DVI or HDMI or later technologies less likely to take off?
Suppose a company sees an opportunity for a better standard with such a law in place. They would have to develop the new standard and create the market for the new standard, all while their change is forbidden by law. How can they propose a new standard before actually developing it? Then, after sinking the costs on a hope, they would have to pay more to fight to change the law to encompass the new standard against everyone who likes it the way it is.
Don’t get me wrong. It would be neat if every doodad I had used the same connector. But soon enough, any connector we care to choose is a straitjacket. We raise the standard for improvement from being incremental and iterative to no change short of world shaking all at one go.
This generally occurs when a user enters the correct password, but has a typo in the username. The user is psychologically fixated on the password and overlooks the actual mistake.
Then, when changing the password, they re-enter the current password and finally discover the password was never the problem.
deleted by creator