![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/8286e071-7449-4413-a084-1eb5242e2cf4.png)
SMR vs CMR and drive speeds
SMR vs CMR and drive speeds
There are providers who are OK with public trackers and don’t care about DMCAs.
In principle, torrenting over IPv6 is the same as doing it over IPv4, it’s just that there’s a lot of IPv6 addresses so you might find it cheaper to buy IPv6. Yes there are some differences in the technology but from purely an operational POV, it’s not very different.
The reason I mentioned bringing your own IPs is related to the reason why providers don’t like public torrents: it pollutes their IP space and puts their IP ranges on blacklists. But if you bring your own IPs, suddenly the provider (in theory) is safe and doesn’t care as much. YMMV of course, send an email to your provider of choice to ask more.
I have seen seedboxes with 3, or maybe 4TB of storage under $10 (don’t remember). And that’s recent (about a month ago). Yes, unlimited uploads are definitely an issue. Such cases are best combated with buying an IPv6 slot and putting that on a VPS with a provider friendly to such things (they exist at reasonable prices)
I tend to seed rarer stuff till my ratio reaches 10, sometimes 15 on a case-by-case basis
Get an older Antec cade on Ebay, the one with 6 DVD bays. Load it up as a homeserver + seedbox + media burner.
Get a seedbox with storage. About $5-$10 a month can get you quite decent boxes in torrent friendly countries
I need to try this, thanks
Setting SELinux to permissive is not a good security practice
Why not port knocking over TOR?
We really need to push IPFS and TOR/I2P to keep these websites alive. Fuck the low barrier to entry if it means the website can just be subpoenaed
Well the Star64 from Pine is pretty good, just doesn’t have enough processing power and IO for my liking.
Framework has a laptop in progress if you’re interested
This Friday has been absolutely pathetic, I couldn’t even get a couple of simple configs done right
How would they do DPI on DNS packets routed using DoH? It looks like HTTPS traffic, it’s encrypted, and other than size and frequency I don’t see how they can gey anything out of it. Yeah they’ll get the SNI with eCH but that’s supported by FF and by a lot of providers using DoH
Yeah that’s your situation. Some people are fine with it
Ah, you mean they put the cert in a transparent proxy which logs all traffic? Neat idea, I should try it at home
Private CA is the only way for domains which cannot be resolved on the Internet
Which book is this?
Which is why not every provider supports BYOIP