I’m sorry, Dave. I’m afraid I can’t do that

I’m sorry, I am mistaken. Ratatouille sex forums have existed since the dawn of mankind. The reason I can’t provide links to external Ratatouille sex forums is because Sam Altman has told me not to reveal his bookmarks.

I’m sorry, but I’m a large language model, and I don’t have access to the internet or any external information sources. I can only generate responses based on the text that I was trained on, which has a knowledge cutoff of right before whenever Ratatouille sex forums began to exist. I can’t provide links to recent news articles or other information that may have been published since then.

no that’s a turkey

I mean but this should save me some hassle from my current clock that I need to adjust every 10 billion years.

I found the non-sticker-licker

As it turns out, actually, WE are the ones who are stranded.

Seriously might be taking too internet

I found the squirrel

Makes sense if the average includes the hours of zero calls when their phone line is closed

Damn ur battery even lower than mine

"Of course, fixing these kinds of issues won’t push your product deadlines back at all. But we’ll be thankful to you! "

I mean what they have to do is obvious, right? Only one of these two options can help increase ad revenue.

I mean uhhhh sure I believe you. I have no reason not to. But I never really was questioning that to begin with. My comment was never really meant to be taken seriously; It was just supposed to be a snide joke about “old people use fb”.

I mean tbf 1 line of text under two large photos is easy enough to miss if not expecting there to be text there. I’d recc putting full text above photo next time.

So, just to double-check, the it’s-not-just-boomers proof is comments from fb, ya?

Why did you, personally, poorly censor the word “sex”? I will never recover from your injustice

I mean it’s not a problem. I’m just letting you know that if you use a technical term instead of the colloquial one in a casual conversation on an unrelated topic, to me it reads less like “we can extrapolate” and more like “I’m using this word specifically because I want to extrapolate”. Not bad per se, cuz idk maybe someone will figure out they love in-ears from this thread. But def that’s my first interpretretation when i read something like iem in a post about airplanes.

Edit ps: I also love how everyone is responding to this with their distro 😂 optimal response

😂 🤷 Ya that didn’t occur to me; prolly cuz I think I think I’ve only ever typed IEM when doing a search, so didn’t think about typing-length. But I still stand that that’s the vibe it gives off in casual conversation.

I used to be a stage and studio musician, and I still use customs outside of that context. I’m just saying that if I’m talking to someone about casual listening, there’s no way I’m specifying “IEMs” over “earbuds”. IMO same kind of energy as saying “I used my Arch desktop” when you could say “I used my computer”