thanks for your contributions to artless rhetoric

Sorry, here’s plainer language. Driverless cars are a public menace. People who hail them contribute to the acceptance of that public menace. As a reader, I do not find myself compelled to sympathy for your article’s protagonist. I stay away from places like California’s metro areas, because I do not want to participate in social experiments about me being run over by driverless vehicles.

I hope this has clarified my meaning for you and a lighthearted fuck you right back for posting this propaganda, you corpo-brained parrot.

Things that don’t require effort:

• copypasta from 2017

Some guys were annoying/sexist to her while she participated in a public menace and I guess this is supposed to mean something to me beyond “stay away from California”

Pretty funny to posit that a LLM chatbot ought to talk us out of conspiratorial thinking while running on a corporate GPU farm absolutely BLASTING through electricity and copyright and IP violations because it’s legally convenient for the powerful. Please post more thought provoking unreasonable propaganda.

Ars Technica is a captured outlet. They consistently post dangerous corpo propaganda and little else.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

pretty wild you can still type with that boot in your mouth. how do you see around it? do you just touch type?

😜 👢