That’s a archive. If it was advertised as something to install, then there might be something inside which can be installed, but there are different scenarios. It might be the source of a program, bundled with scripts to configure, compile and install it. It might be the compiled program with our without scripts to copy all the individual files to the right dirs. Maybe it contains just a script which fetches all the files online and installs them. It might contain a virtual enviroment and the program, it might contain another archive…

No offense, but I don’t like this. Not having Karma is one of the main advantages lemmy has. Karma sucks.

Hugo is quite nice and has lots of themes

You can basically connect any local port to any remote port normal or reversed. Reversed is -R, normal with -L. In this setting, correct me if im worng, you want to connect the open port on the airplane to one already prepared on a vps which allows you to do what you want e.g. proxy websites.

I can recommend linkding..

You can’t have a chatbot that gives good answers without having a chatbot that gives liberal answers.

My Futro S740 with an J4105 CPU consumes up to 14 Watts according to this article. It is faster than a rpi 4b plus i bought it refurbished for 40€. I think a system with an I5 6500t will need even more power under load.

Yeah, thin clients are the way to go, but tgey will draw more than 5-7 Watt under load.

And which piece of consumer hardware offers more computing power (relevant for minecraft server) for the same amount of electrical power than a rpi4?

You can’t have more calculation power for the same electrical power consumption. A thin clirnt with an i3 or i5 maybe.

There is a link to their own F-Droid repo, also it is in Izzys repo iirc. Beta version works just fine imo, but I prefer öffi and use transportr only sonetimes when I’m in a new city

Transportr is what you’re looking for.

In F-Droid, there is always a link to the repo. In english it is probably something like “source (code)”. It is in the collapsable menu under “Links”.

Thing is people who have bad things in mind are always more likely to use their own codes. You dont need an encrypted messenger to send encrypted messages. It’s a boy.

But normal people who think that they have nothing to fear and therefore nothing to hide won’t take that efforts upon them. They will live their lifes and one day they could be targeted by a government that wants to eradicate them. Using the data their predecessors gathered.

Privacy brings security under totalitarian regimes or in countries that shift in that direction. They might say if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear, but there are unjust conditions under which you have to hide things, like that you belong to minority that is targeted by the authorities. Like the nazis did in the third reich, where privacy was reduced during their takeover. Or that you belong to a party that is suddenly framed as evil and enemies of the nation. Or if you have connections to “traitors” or other “scum”.

Thanks for sharing.

Erode this, motherf***ers

-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----

jA0ECQMCZkozNkGNm9pg0mIBi2QEYd874BUtduiYHZk2z5lFoRETELg81lvobNqJ bTOkSvMjao9urBrAjd7ZcD7rmbcj+q4FJjt1VUCWUWwyIFr24NN3Kdbv7WCMvBwC FHX+9uMcmxOFO6p5opxCk1uM1w===Bn76

-----END PGP MESSAGE-----

What browser are you using? What do you do to stay private?

Probably you have cookies set ragarding your language preferences for the sites you browse on a regular basis, at least.

Well, I have limited time and happen to know what the microchip crisis was actually about. If he makes this the introduction of his article, he really should try to be more factual and less simplyfing. It sends a signal what to expect from the rest of the article. If have since then skimmed over the article and found some complaints about big tech that I share but in absolutly no way anything that could make things better nor a concise explanation.

And he gets stuff wrong all the time.:

• His depiction of capitlism as something where you create value and get rewarded vs feudalism where you own stuff and get rewarded is fundamentally screwed. How does he think John Rockefeller made his fortune? By refining oil? Well, I’m pretty sure he never in his live refined even one barrel of crude oil. How did Howard Hughes made his fortune? Making something valuable is for some (some also skip this through inheritance) the first step of becoming a super rich. The next step is always letting others (or even your money) work for you, give them less than they deserve and take more than you need.
• Companies trying to maximise profits and being not consumer friendly is no thing that was born in the information age. Already the light bulb had planned obsolence, food safety regulations haven’t always existed so people literally died because some companies liked producing cheaper more than having healthy costumers, tons of highly addictive drugs were sold to people with various claims, most of the time without medical evidence. Consumer protection is a thing that emerged from people fighting for it, and in the end, becoming law. Why this extra step with questionable effects when we could just say: “corporations have to ensure that they’re products are made in a way so they last as long as possible plus must provide ways to repair them really cheap and if anyone fails to comply their company gets taken away by the state”?

It seems to me that he is so much brainwashed by capitalist propaganda that he refuses to call capitalism a broken system despite him decribing it as a broken system but with a different name.