![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/ed443f52-9fcc-46bc-941b-04e8c5d74224.jpeg)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/2QNz7bkA1V.png)
Think of the poor shareholders!
Think of the poor shareholders!
Someone surely tried this on a Tesla by now…
It’s complicated. Technically no, but God can roll out a new image with the updates, so in practice, yes?
Why is religion never simple…
What.
The article says that, for the GPUs, they can have a “maximum power draw of 45,000 W at full tilt”.
The 28 million W comes from the full system, and surely the massive displays, LEDs and eventually sound system makes up the bulk of that, the gfx cards are a rounding error…
Technically, isn’t this a different thing? Genuinely asking.
There could be a license that forbids use (sort of like the CC no commercial use license) but still allows the code to be reviewed publicly, no?
Maybe this invention revolutionised how we clean our butts, or maybe it was utterly trivial and 20 different ways of cutting paper rolls were patented that same year (note that present day rolls don’t even use this method).
But that’s irrelevant to the point that seems to be implied here that patents somehow contributed to it’s success. They don’t, an invention will be useful or not based on its own merits, not on the fact they’re patented.
They exist to ensure whoever registered it makes a profit, which is why they’re being exploited way past the point of making up for any good they were supposed to bring…
So the innovation that was patented is literally “cut it partway through”.
Patents are inherently stupid and only serve to stifle progress. Change my mind or otherwise just downvote away, works as well.
People here be discussing the wrong thing, or am I the only one thinking that patenting a roll of paper is incredibly stupid?
It’s a damn roll of paper. How much of a genius do you have to be to come up with that? People have been doing it for millennia, the only difference is that it used to be so expensive that no one would think of whipping their butts with it.
Data privacy AND not having to deal with more bullshit AI? Oh my, how will we ever cope with this… /s
This is what they want you to believe…
Because they didn’t come out saying they won’t enable ads. They just quietly renamed the toggle to say something else, and that is shady AF. Why are you trying to spin it positively?
So the only way to ban dicks is for them to have a PSN account? That ain’t it my brother.
Sony servers, sure, just release a server binary, let others host it and offload all infrastructure costs! Massive savings!
Don’t suck corporate ass man, cmon.
Nah brother. Because it’s in the TOS doesn’t make it OK, and in some cases, even legally enforceable.
Why are you sticking up for some arbitrary shitty corporate decision and feel the need to shift the blame to people who bought, and now supposedly OWN, the game?
I can respect it if you’re doing it for money, we all gotta eat. But if it’s for free, you’re just an ass
Which to Nintendo, wouldn’t matter a bit.
The assholes managing these megacorps are in it for the buck. When they squeeze the final scraps of profit, they go do it somewhere else, having padded their bank accounts and their resume with tales of how they are able to extract maximum returns…
Gollum wasn’t golluming yet.
Techtonica is my new love. It’s like I’m still in my basement, but eerie, bioluminescent plants claimed everything.
Early in development, but really good IMO, even the story they have so far is really great.
Google says that “regulatory requirements” have led to this decision, presumably referring to the EU’s Digital Markets Act or other recent legislation. The precise reason isn’t mentioned by Google.
What are those clock faces doing, Google?
WHAT. ARE. THEY. DOING?!
Hell nah. They cannot be the sole gatekeepers, alternative app stores that are outside of Apple’s control need to exist.
Aw.