![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/pictrs/image/a18b0c69-23c9-4b2a-b8e0-3aca0172390d.png)
If I misunderstood your post, it wasn’t intentional. Would you mind elaborating?
If I misunderstood your post, it wasn’t intentional. Would you mind elaborating?
Either way there are a lot more contexts where one can use slut and not be shitty.
True, but I don’t think that’s the case here.
There’s no “punching down”, unlike with the antiquated ‘R’ word…
Women can’t be “punched down” on? News to me…
Sex shaming is fun?
A lot of that was exaggerated. 7 minutes per puff really doesn’t sound realistic. But since it convinced people to stop smoking I guess everyone agreed that some misinformation was OK?
7 minutes per puff? Who says that?
If that happens, they just fall back to the first option of waiting for their provider to set up the IPMI.
They are fundamentally different types of vehicles. But putting that aside, if you want to compare the largest payload that each vehicle can transport you wouldn’t just use the pickup truck’s GVWR, you would also include it’s towing capacity. There’s a reason 90% of the time people use a pickup to haul something, they’re towing.
This is why we can directly compare the two vehicles payload capacity.
No, comparing a zeppelin with a pickup will never be a direct comparison.
You’re comparing a pickup truck to a zeppelin, there’s no way to make that apples to apples. If someone needs to move something big with a truck they’re probably going to tow it, not try to load it into the bed.
Because of their smaller and the switch to helium Zeppelin NTs has a miniscule payload capacity at 4200 pounds. To put that into perspective that’s the same payload capacity as a Ford F250.
And that’s only the bed capacity. An F250 can tow over 20,000 lbs depending on the trailer design. Most trucks and SUVs can tow >4200lbs.
Several categories like incitement, false advertising and CSAM should not be acceptable “speech”.
In those examples it’s not the speech that’s illegal, there’s a real crime that the speech is part of. False advertising is a form of fraud, but if there’s no fraud involved (satire, humor, education, etc) it’s legal.
If freedom of speech only applies to “acceptable” speech, then it isn’t really freedom of speech.
I mean, Lemmy is basically an internet addict support group.
YouTube is a decent source of info for some subjects, like vehicle maintenance and 3d printing. Of course it still depends on the channel/creator…
Datasheets are copyrighted by the silicon manufacturer, not the product manufacturer, and usually covered by an NDA. Spotify probably couldn’t release them even if they wanted to.
No, yuzu’s main problem was being a for-profit company. That seemed to be central to Nintendo’s case against them. The company behind yuzu was making millions.
No, that’s too rational. What leverage does he have on all of these distro maintainers? Someone needs to get to the bottom of this! /s
Hopefully by then Poettering will have retired and stopped inflicting his software in people.
How did he get so much influence over most mainstream distros? Asking for a friend…
That’s where I disagree, spreading misinformation as scientific fact causes people to lose trust in health authorities, and it fuels things like the anti-vax movement and flat earthers. The ends don’t justify the means.