![](https://kbin.melroy.org/media/14/36/1436544f379b170dbb63e499734bf582a5c48a6051ea7dce3a1cb6a8c4e408c5.webp)
![](https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/pictrs/image/a18b0c69-23c9-4b2a-b8e0-3aca0172390d.png)
It just updated a month ago buddy. uYou is the tweak
[He/Him, Nosist, Touch typist, Enthusiast, Superuser impostorist, keen-eyed humorist, endeavourOS shillist, kotlin useist, wonderful bastard, professinal pedant miser]
Stuped person says stuped things, people boom
I have trouble with using tone in my words but not interpreting tone from others’ words. Weird, isn’t it?
Formerly on kbin.social and dbzer0
It just updated a month ago buddy. uYou is the tweak
They do provide releases; uYou is a tweak
That has a lot less features, unfortunately. Like Enhanced recently added a copy video to timestamp. Enhanced just has more active development
assuming that MS is going to 0-day patch win10 to all customers even if they haven’t paid for the extended support
I don’t see how you came to that conclusion. It sounds like they resell enterprise patches to individuals.
Darn you broadband
3GB, actually. That was on iPhone XR, which is basically the only budge iPhone Apple has made.
We already have that since iOS 15 if you have a phone that released after the iPhone X. It’s time to become woke, sheeple.
Unfortunately, that’s like saying everyone has the right to read any book that IA usually archives for free at any time. Do I agree with that? Yes. Does it hurt intellectual property? Yes. There’s obviously evidence that readers used the service a lot. I agree with the principle, but they should’ve just temporarily “merged” with public libraries and increased borrowing limits for books in stock, not allow everyone in the United States to just get a book as long as they have less than 9 other books as well.
McNamara seemed to suggest that publishers would have been further enriched if not for IA providing unprecedented free, unlimited e-books access.
— https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/03/book-publishers-with-surging-profits-struggle-to-prove-internet-archive-hurt-sales/, linked in a link in the article
I’d say it’s as boat is to airplane
@const_void@lemmy.ml UI kit doesn’t necessarily mean good/bad design
@kde@lemmy.kde.social @kde@floss.social @tsonfeir@lemmy.world @GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml @leopold@lemmy.kde.social
According to Wikipedia, they made a ton of games, including a ton of licensed IPs.
I saw the original LAMF post. A detail missing here was that the inspectors were joking (that it could be dangerous) at first when they saw the cut because even they didn’t know how dangerous it was.
Archive.today is way more energy-efficient and actually gives you the article details
Just use an archive service lol
That seems like a Wikipedia capture for the wrong page instead of AI.
what the heck’s the second picture
Yeah, but there’s still the possibility of them releasing it. Anyway, my point is that there’s no monetary incentive for them to skew the results.
Someone uploaded Enhanced which fixes (nearly) all of the bugs to https://archive.org/details/uYouEnhanced_19.21.2_3.0.4.