I’m all for it.

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    Man, I’m just going to say it… I’m sick of all the Linux people saying it’s the solution to all problems in computing. Can we not talk about anything else here on Lemmy? This article is about Windows.

    • d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, this is platform which runs on Linux and embodies the same spirit which drives Linux forward - the collaborative power of opensource software. Is shouldn’t come as a surprise that there’s a heavy skew of Linux and opensource enthusiasts here. If you’re sick of all the Linux talk here, feel free to move to a propriety forum, perhaps one with a red alien logo.

      This article is about Windows.

      The article is about Window 10 becoming EOL, and given how many people are put off by Windows 11, suggesting Linux as an alternative is a reasonable comment, IMO. Feel free to argue otherwise if you feel so strong against it.

    • graymess@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      100%. I’m very happy for the people in the Linux community who have collectively supported a free and open source operating system that is effectively as good or better than the two leading OSs with massive billion dollar corporations behind them. That’s unfathomably impressive, deserving of all this praise and, of course, should have wider adoption.

      However

      I’ve spent my entire life on Windows, my professional career on Mac OS, and the last dozen or so years with my phones running Android. I absolutely do not have the patience and free time to become fluent in another fucking operating system. And I’ve tried. On at least two occasions, I’ve attempted to run a media server on Linux. The experience was utterly fucking miserable and made me want to give up on technology and live in the woods. I have no doubt that I’d have a different outcome with better resources or more time to learn properly, but I’m done. Hopefully the successes of Linux drive change for the better in the other two. Linux doesn’t need 100% adoption to make an impact on the way Microsoft and Apple develop their own systems.

        • denshirenji@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          There is a lot to unpack, but you know exactly what they meant. The operating system people refer to as Linux or GNU/Linux or whatever is not the same thing as Android; if, under the hood, it has an older version of the Linux kernel. There is no command line required on an android phone for one.

          Although, you are technically correct. The best kind.

          • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            There is no command line required on an android phone for one.

            Generally not required on modern desktop distros either, unless you want to tinker or have poorly supported hardware. Package management, including kernel updates, binary drivers, etc. can all be done in the GUI.

            Then again, I spend most of my time in the terminal because I like it.

            • denshirenji@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Then again, I spend most of my time in the terminal because I like it.

              Same. And I spend more time setting things up then using them.

                • denshirenji@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yes, it is. I used some derivation of microwave a long time ago on some forum or another, but it’s a common word so I threw it in Google Translate and started using this one other places.

    • iegod@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Photoshop alone is worth keeping a windows or OSX device around.

      • gornius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You just need to realize that Adobe doesn’t release their stuff on Linux, not because it doesn’t allow them to, but Linux desktop market share is too small.

        It’s a chicken and egg problem. Once Adobe would release their stuff, magically there would be a massive movement to improve HDR support, color accuracy etc.

        And you need to realize Microsoft achieved such a giant market share thanks to illegal monopolistic practices in 90s, that still have huge impacts today.

        • iegod@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That doesn’t change the reality that I will go where Photoshop is available.

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s an Adobe problem

        If the audience moves to Linux then it will follow

    • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, someone could develop a new OS or a mainstream-friendly fork of Plan 9. The problem is literally over-reliance on privately-owned, proprietary software during an era where enshitification is the norm. GNU/Linux is the most mainstream-friendly OS that is not* proprietary.

      *Some bits that are regularly used are obviously proprietary. See: RHEL

    • KroninJ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m strong on the Linux side and just swapped over my last PC from Windows. Long time it’s been needing it.

      But I completely agree with you. 95% of consumers would most likely have difficulty just getting it installed. Basic usage, maybe a greater number could be fine using it but once something goes wrong, no one wants to use the terminal.

      And this is also a Windows thread.

    • Secret300@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sorry but the answer is Linux. It’s got great support for devices and is open source. If adobe and a few other companies would port their software for Linux there’d honestly be no reason to use Windows or Mac except for a few that prefer it.

      If bsd was more popular than the answer would be that. We just need to have an open source OS as the norm