Apple played into the greenwashing since a long time. For example removing charger for “climate”, “ecology”, while changing the cable port from a usb A (the rectangle one you plug onto the charger) to a usb C when first removing the charger from the box (thanks for bringing this s* to android too).

  • Bernie Ecclestoned@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yes, the article is not about that…

    They removed the charger to save cost and waste. Who really needed another wall wart?

    Moving to usb c is because of EU regulations

    • 520@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re both talking past each other.

      First, they had thunderbolt to USB A cables and a USB A charger.

      Then they had thunderbolt to USB C cables and a USB C charger.

      Then they were forced by the EU to swap out the thunderbolt connector with USB C on the device itself.

      • Bernie Ecclestoned@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They’re claiming apple was greenwashing when they removed the charger. It removed cost and waste, it can be both green and good business.

        I thought they were arguing that the move to usb c was also greenwashing, when it was the EU regulations, again to reduce waste. It is green, not greenwashing.