I assume many of you host a DMS such as Paperless and use it to organise the dead trees you still receive in the snail mail for some reason in the year of the lord 2023.

How do you encode your scans? JPEG is pretty meh for text even at better quantisation levels (“dirty” artefacts everywhere) and PNGs are quite large. More modern formats don’t go into a PDF, which means multiple pages aren’t possible (at least not in Paperless).

Discussion on GH: https://github.com/paperless-ngx/paperless-ngx/discussions/3756

  • Saigonauticon@voltage.vn
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh, it’s common in my country to use a smartphone to ‘scan’ documents by actually just taking a lousy photo of them. It’s so prevalent that when you tell someone to do a scan they usually do this instead.

    I bought a cheap canon scanner for 50$ and it’s pretty perfect for legal documents. A little slow maybe. I use SANE, then do lossy compression too.

    In rare situations I’d then post process the PDF to even worse quality using ghostscript, for example when a foreign visa application form requires a scan of a really long document, but doesn’t accept sizes over 2MB.

    • Atemu@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I use SANE, then do lossy compression too.

      Well, what kind of lossy compression? JPEG?

      IME, JPEG looks quite terrible for text documents -even at q=95.

        • Atemu@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hmm, I’m using grayscale PNGs as my baseline here. A 150dpi scan is about 1.3MiB.

          A (for the purpose of text documents) similar quality WEBP is about 1/4 of that.

          • kyle@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You could also try adjusting the contrast a bit. I use an app called Genius Scan, which increases the contrast of the scanned image to reduce the number of bits needed per pixel. This reduces the size of the file quite a bit, although it obviously isn’t a true representation of the scanned document. The TextCleaner imagemagick plugin looks like it’s doing something similar.

            • Atemu@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes, as I said.

              As also mentioned in the post, I need a solution for multiple pages and an image (no matter what format) only represents a single page and WEBPs don’t go into PDFs.