• Peddlephile@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    …Change to the constitution to allow first peoples more say over things that directly affect them via establishing a representative body.

    Voting no means that you are against the above. Voting yes means you’re for it.

    If you’re against it, it does feel quite racist as you’re voting not to have an indigenous voice enshrined in our constitution. Why not let them have a fair go?

      • Peddlephile@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        But since colonisation, there hasn’t been one. There was a committee briefly appointed by Rudd but then abolished by Abbott.

        I’d like it enshrined because then we would have one regardless and it would take a huge effort to get it removed.

          • Peddlephile@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It would still be better than creating a committee and then abolishing it completely until any leadership decides it’s in their interests to establish one.

            We also won’t be in charge of how it’s going to work, remember. This referendum is just whether or not it should be in the constitution as a requirement.

            I believe it should be.