• Twig@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    antiX doesn’t use SystemD, so that works for me. A nice balance between lightweight and being lazy and not having to set it up from scratch, but it doesn’t feel quite as janky as Puppy Linux.

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Why wouldn’t you like systemD? It’s easier to learn than most distributions

      I guess its commands are a bit long

    • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Imo when it comes to lightweight distros theres a reason why you set it up manually, when 100mb is the difference between a usable system it makes sense for the user to customize it to their needs.

      • Twig@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        I get that. It depends what you’re after. I just wanted something that’d run on old hardware without too much effort.

        • psud@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Debian is good for that, unless the system is a laptop with no RJ45 port and a wireless card which needs a non-free driver