It’s a weird headline, but the discussion is around how journalists and the public look through internet history in cases like this. Some of it is helpful, some of it is not.

In particular, it’s a response to this article:

‘Extremely ironic’: Suspect in UnitedHealthcare CEO slaying played video game killer, friend recalls (NBCNews)

The game in this case being AmongUs…

Monday night, NBC News published an article with the headline “’Extremely Ironic’: Suspect in UnitedHealthcare CEO Slaying Played Video Game Killer, Friend Recalls.” This article is currently all over every single one of my social media feeds, because it is emblematic of the type of research I described above. It is a very bad article whose main reason for existing is the fact that it contains a morsel of “new” “information,” except the “information” in this case is that Luigi Mangione played the video game Among Us at some point in college.

cross-posted from: https://rss.ponder.cat/post/72744

  • kaitco@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    12 days ago

    What about just banning dihydrogen monoxide? That stuff kills 100% of those who consume it and is, like, everywhere!

    • TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      12 days ago

      It’s used in everything from pesticides to baby formula… when are people going to wake up to the dangers it poses?

      • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 days ago

        Seriously, do you have any idea how bad it would be for the economy if we did that? You guys wants us becoming as poor as europeans?? Look you have to let the free market decide which chemicals do and don’t go into your body. If I were a grandmother I would gladly drown in dihydrogen monoxide just so my children could work more hours in the excel factory. It’s what Adam Smith would have wanted!

    • Jarix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      It doesnt kill 100% of people who consume it, 100% of people who consume it die

      Learn the difference for future reference

      • Klear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        It still kills more than 320,000 people every year, and that’s just from ingesting it.

        • Jarix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          What were you hoping to achieve? 320,000 is not 8,200,000,000 which would be 100%

          320000 is 0.0039024390243902% of 8200000000.

          • Klear@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 days ago

            Drowning. Over 300 thousand people drown every year according to my 20 seconds of research. Those are killed by DHMO directly.

            • Jarix@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 days ago

              What are you trying to achieve. What is your goal here. What is it you are attempting to accomplish?

              I literally did the math for you. Three hundred twenty thousand people is less than zero point zero zero four percent of eight billion two hundred million people also known as one hundred percent of people who drank dihydrogen monoxide

              I never claimed water cant kill people, i pointed out a flawed claim and then gave the correct information they should have used