• magic_lobster_party@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Even when computers did improve and became able to handle Vista people weren’t willing to change their minds about it. Windows 7 had a 1GB memory requirement. Why didn’t more people use Vista right before the Windows 7 launch?

    • Broken@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s where your comment about initial reputation kicks in. I’m in agreement with that. I’m just not in agreement the bad impression was unwarranted.

      The talks about 7 at the time still pressed why an XP user would switch, since XP was a great OS and worked well without any glaring missing features. This is a reverse proof. The reputation of XP was so strong that it was still hard to get people to switch 2 OS versions later.

      • moonbunny@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Just to add, Vista’s biggest change broke compatibility with so many applications with the implementation of User Access Control (UAC).

        While it was a long-overdue feature for security, lots of older applications would either fail to install or not work properly because it expected to have full system access with no roadblocks. While there was compatibility mode, the results were still very much hit or miss.

        Then there was the massive headache around the original implementation of UAC which would constantly go off, usually multiple times during a software installation and again when starting some applications. Most people would’ve turned off UAC because of how annoying it was.