• chakan2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 month ago

    There are going to be a lot of instances going forward where you don’t know you were interacting with an AI.

    If there’s a quality check on the output, sure, they’re liable.

    If a Tesla runs you into an ambulance at 80mph…the very expensive Tesla lawyers will win.

    It’s a solid quandary.

    • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Why would the lawyer defendant not know they’re interacting with AI? Would the AI generated content appear to be actual case law? How would that confusion happen?

      • chakan2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Immediate things that come to mind are bots on Reddit. Twitter is 70% bot traffic. People interact with them all day every day and don’t know.

        That quickly spirals into customer service. If you’re not talking to a guy with a thick Indian accent, could be a bot at this point.

        A lot of professional business services are exploring AI hard…what happens when one tells the business to do something monumentally stupid and said business does it? Is it the people who are training the AI? Is the machine at fault for a hallucination? Is it the poor schmuck at the bottom that pushed the delete button?

        It’s not cut and dry when you’re interacting with a machine any more.