Meta “programmed it to simply not answer questions,” but it did anyway.

  • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    You can indeed prove certain properties on these models.

    Okay, how does the model prove the assassination attempt happened? Because that is what OP was talking about.
    It was clear from the context that OP was saying “It is impossible to mathematically determine if something [historical] is correct.” They omitted one word and instead of using context clues you went into a long unnecessary post on how we prove even numbers are divisible by 2. If you tried Iron Manning their post instead of trying to show off with an “Um Actually…” You wouldn’t be getting lost in the replies as we’d be staying on the original topic.

    The main point though is that everyone including OP is trying to discredit AI by bringing up things it was never supposed to be good at.

    We’re missing the context again. It’s not people trying to discredit AI. People are trying to discredit companies insisting on using AI for things it is bad at.

    It sounds like you actually agree with OP: AI should not be used for this purpose. Instead of saying “I agree, this is a bad use of AI, it should only be used for X, Y, and Z” you felt the need to White Knight for AI. The problem right now isn’t AI being attacked, it’s companies treating AI like a miracle that can do everything.